跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2471新增论文
+2025其中 AI 相关
+163已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 01:51 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-10 15:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 02:03 — 2026-11-11 02:03(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 01:51最近发现新增版本:2026-11-10 15:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-10 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

20,643 已收录论文17,531 AI 相关5,643 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 01:49(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11532

DriveFoundry: Co-Evolving Data and Model for Efficient Closed-Loop Iteration in Autonomous Driving

Ziyang Yao, Yuncheng Jiang, Fang Li, Haochen Liu, Shaoqing Xu, Wen Zhang, Xiangyang Chu, Zibin Guo 等 27 位作者

原文摘要

A driving foundation model must learn reusable decision knowledge from rare critical events and apply it under strict runtime constraints. We introduce DriveFoundry, a closed-loop framework improving iteration efficiency under data and computation budgets by coupling structured causal data refinement with adaptive inference. The Data Engine builds traceable scene-candidate records linking scene evidence and factor-decision relations to candidate trajectories and outcome assessments. Candidate comparisons and counterfactual annotations clarify how scene factors affect behavioral feasibility and preference. Verified model failures guide VLM-assisted annotation and expert correction, refining training data and annotation systems. The model engine, Xiaomi-Drive-o1, unifies Perception, Causation, Action, World, and Value within a shared vision-language backbone to enable cross-task knowledge transfer. Block-wise latent refill passes candidate-specific evidence and predicted visual consequences between task blocks, connecting scene understanding, planning, and evaluation. A learned value-of-computation head selects tasks and allocates latent tokens based on expected benefit and cost, adapting inference to each decision. On PhysicalAI, the 9B model achieves the lowest ADE@1 across evaluated splits and horizons among tested models. In AlpaSim, it outperforms Alpamayo 1.5 across all metrics and achieves lower close-encounter and off-road rates than the 34B Alpamayo 2 Super, while trailing in progress and AlpaSim scores. For the 0.8B variant, joint training reduces 5 s minADE@6 by about 54% without altering the inference path or token budget. Adaptive inference matches full reasoning performance using only 28% of tokens. Real-vehicle tests confirm runtime feasibility, supporting a unified paradigm for learning from critical experience and dynamically allocating computation.

cs.AI