We study first-order and best-of-both-worlds regret guarantees in multi-armed bandits. Pogodin and Lattimore (2019) proposed an algorithm that combines minimax-optimal worst-case regret with a first-order guarantee whose loss-dependent term is $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{K L^\star}\log T)$, where $T$ denotes the horizon, $L^\star$ denotes the smallest expected cumulative loss among fixed arms, and $K$ denotes the number of arms. However, a logarithmic gap remains between this loss-dependent term and the optimal first-order scale. In this paper, we remove this logarithmic factor by proposing an efficient and parameter-free algorithm that achieves the minimax optimal first-order regret guarantee $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{K L^\star})$. Technically, our algorithm is built upon FTRL with a Tsallis entropy regularizer (Zimmert and Seldin,2021), with a learning rate adapted to the learner's cumulative loss and a sampling distribution determined by a scalar fixed point. This construction controls the combined estimation and stability cost in terms of the learner's loss. Moreover, we show that the same algorithm achieves a best-of-both-worlds guarantee, with $\mathcal{O}(\sum_{i\ne i^\star}\frac{\log T}{Δ_i})$ regret for i.i.d. losses with a unique best arm $i^\star$, where $Δ_i$ denotes the suboptimality gap of arm $i$.
Chen Zhang, Kepu Zhang, Jiatong Zhang, Xiao Zhang, Jun Xu
Query correction is a critical entry point in modern search pipelines, demanding high accuracy strictly within real-time latency constraints. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning improves accuracy but incurs prohibitive latency for real-time query correction. A potential solution is to output an answer before reasoning to reduce latency; however, under autoregressive decoding, the early answer is independent of subsequent reasoning, preventing the model from leveraging its reasoning capability to improve accuracy. To address this issue, we propose Sandwich Reasoning (SandwichR), a novel approach that explicitly aligns a fast initial answer with post-hoc reasoning, enabling low-latency query correction without sacrificing reasoning-aware accuracy. SandwichR follows an Answer-Reasoning-Answer paradigm, producing an initial correction, an explicit reasoning process, and a final refined correction. To align the initial answer with post-reasoning insights, we design a consistency-aware reinforcement learning (RL) strategy: a dedicated consistency reward enforces alignment between the initial and final corrections, while margin-based rejection sampling prioritizes borderline samples where reasoning drives the most impactful corrective gains. Additionally, we construct a high-quality query correction dataset, addressing the lack of specialized benchmarks for complex query correction. Experimental results demonstrate that SandwichR achieves SOTA accuracy comparable to standard CoT while delivering a 40-70% latency reduction, resolving the latency-accuracy trade-off in online search.
Flow matching is a scalable generative framework for characterizing continuous normalizing flows with wide-range applications. However, current state-of-the-art methods are not well-suited for modeling dynamical systems, as they construct conditional paths using linear interpolants that may not capture the underlying state evolution, especially when learning higher-order dynamics from irregular sampled observations. Constructing unified paths that satisfy multi-marginal constraints across observations is challenging, since naïve higher-order polynomials tend to be unstable and oscillatory. We introduce SplineFlow, a theoretically grounded flow matching algorithm that jointly models conditional paths across observations via B-spline interpolation. Specifically, SplineFlow exploits the smoothness and stability of B-spline bases to learn the complex underlying dynamics in a structured manner while ensuring the multi-marginal requirements are met. Comprehensive experiments across various deterministic and stochastic dynamical systems of varying complexity, as well as on cellular trajectory inference tasks, demonstrate the strong improvement of SplineFlow over existing baselines. Our code is available at: https://github.com/santanurathod/SplineFlow.
AI systems built around large models increasingly use experience and feedback to make persistent changes to models, prompts, memories, tools, and workflows. Recursive self-improvement (RSI) extends this process to inductive biases and to the mechanisms that govern future updates, which can themselves be revised and reused across improvement cycles. Yet self-modification alone does not guarantee trustworthy improvement. Reported gains may reflect flawed evaluations, previously acquired capabilities may deteriorate, and compliance with behavioral constraints may weaken. Compromised artifacts or sensitive information may also persist in successor systems. Changes to improvement mechanisms may invalidate earlier verification results and make human oversight less effective. This survey presents an operational definition and process framework for RSI and organizes the requirements for trustworthy RSI into four interconnected themes: genuine and sustained improvement; behavioral constraints, alignment, and fairness; system security and privacy; and transparency and controllability. We examine these themes from three perspectives: Improvement Validity, Constraint Preservation, and Effective Oversight. This analysis covers improvement diagnosis, proposal generation, proposal evaluation, and update implementation (S1--S4), including the recursive application of these stages to improvement mechanisms (RI). We review risks, safeguards, and evaluation evidence for individual updates, effects inherited by successor systems, and revisions to improvement mechanisms, while distinguishing direct RSI findings from evidence in related systems. Finally, we examine evaluation settings, identify requirements for independent and longitudinal assessment, and discuss applications and open research problems.
LLM-based agents have moved automated program repair (APR) from fixed-context patch generation to interactive repository-level repair. However, existing agentic APR systems still struggle to use execution evidence to guide localization, patch generation, and validation. We propose EviACT (Evidence-to-Action), an agentic APR framework that coordinates three evidence-driven guardrails across repair stages. The retrieval scaffold grounds repair context, the compile gate filters invalid edits, and the test-driven gate checks target-test recovery before full regression. Across four benchmarks, EviACT improves resolve rate over the strongest reported comparable baselines by 1.6-6.0 percentage points and shows 70.1-88.6% lower reported per-bug API cost where baseline costs are available. Ablations and diagnostics suggest that these gains are associated with the coordinated evidence-to-action chain, making agentic APR more effective and efficient.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has been proposed to mitigate hallucinations in large language models (LLMs), where generated outputs may be factually incorrect. However, existing RAG approaches predominantly rely on vector similarity for retrieval, which is prone to semantic noise and fails to ensure that generated responses fully satisfy the complex conditions specified by factual queries, often leading to incorrect answers. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel research problem, named Exact Retrieval Problem (ERP). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first problem formulation that explicitly incorporates structural information into RAG for factual questions to satisfy all query conditions. For this novel problem, we propose Structure Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation (SG-RAG), which models the retrieval process as an embedding-based subgraph matching task, and uses the retrieved topological structures to guide the LLM to generate answers that meet all specified query conditions. To facilitate evaluation of ERP, we construct and publicly release Exact Retrieval Question Answering (ERQA), a large-scale dataset comprising 120{,}000 fact-oriented QA pairs, each involving complex conditions, spanning 20 diverse domains. The experimental results demonstrate that SG-RAG significantly outperforms strong baselines on ERQA, delivering absolute improvements from 20.68 to 50.88 points across all evaluation metrics, while maintaining reasonable computational overhead.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表