跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1622新增论文
+1249其中 AI 相关
+172已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 14:12 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 13:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 15:05 — 2026-11-11 15:05(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 14:12最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 13:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,672 已收录论文18,320 AI 相关6,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 14:10(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.31471

Ask About the Right Moment: Training-Free Object Identity Reasoning for Video-Language Models

Di Yang, Xiaochang Li, Muyang Liu, Yufei Wang, Yanhai Xiong

原文摘要

Many questions about a video concern one physical object. Where does the ball end up after the cups are shuffled? Which card is the queen? How often was the mug covered? Open video-language models (Video-LMs) recognise such objects in single frames but do not keep them apart over time. On shuffled shell games, open models from eight families stay near chance, and so do published tool agents. We separate semantic identity binding from temporal identity maintenance. Binding should happen at a moment when the evidence for the object is visible, and maintenance should be left to a tracker. Track, Then Bind implements this principle without training. A promptable video tracker follows every candidate object and draws it with a track number. A frozen vision-language model (VLM) answers one question about the identifying evidence, which binds the target to a track. The answer is then derived from a text description of the tracks. With Qwen3-VL-32B, the agent solves both VET-Bench tasks, where a fine-tuned trajectory model reaches 92% and 90%. On real cup games from the Perception Test, it raises accuracy from 35.5% to 52.3%. Without retuning, the same configuration also solves VET-Bench with Gemma 4 and GPT-5.5. Its track-derived visibility timelines add 8.8-17.9 points on TOC-Bench for open models. GPT-6.1 already answers 92.5% of the real cup games directly but 71.0% through our pipeline, while our timelines still raise its TOC-Bench accuracy from 52.5% to 57.7%. The benefit of external tracking thus depends on the underlying model and the task.

cs.CV