跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+6403新增论文
+5442其中 AI 相关
+112已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 10:10 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 10:10各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 10:41 — 2026-11-05 10:41(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 10:10最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 10:10库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 12:53

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,080 已收录论文13,117 AI 相关3,141 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 10:08(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.01731

Robust EEG-based Emotion Recognition from Coarse Trial-level Labels under Intra-trial Affective Variability

Xiaocong Zeng, Buxuan Wang, Xin Yang, Pei Huang, Dongyang Kuang

EEG-based emotion recognition has become an active research area in brain-computer interfaces. However, fine-grained affective annotation is costly, so most datasets provide only a global label for each long EEG trial. For practical emotion recognition, trials are commonly divided into short temporal windows, with the global label propagated to all windows for training. This practice treats trial-level emotion as temporally uniform, although affective responses may fluctuate within a trial. Consequently, windows that weakly reflect or deviate from the global emotional state may receive unreliable labels, posing a key challenge to robust EEG-based emotion recognition. To address this challenge, we propose VARY, a variability-aware robust learning framework for EEG-based emotion recognition from coarse trial-level labels. VARY incorporates a Two-stage Sample Selection (TSS) strategy to identify EEG windows with reliable emotional labels, and introduces MixAug, a data augmentation method tailored for EEG to improve model robustness under limited and unreliable supervision. We comprehensively evaluate VARY under the setting of label-noise learning on two public datasets, using three network architectures and multiple label-noise settings. Our method demonstrates superior performance, achieving a maximum accuracy gain of 11.54% on the DREAMER dataset and 5.39% on the SEED dataset compared with the best-performing baseline, highlighting the effectiveness of VARY in learning from unreliable trial-level labels under intra-trial affective variability.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG · cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗