跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1672新增论文
+1256其中 AI 相关
+198已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-14 06:58 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 20:44各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-13 07:03 — 2026-11-14 07:03(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-14 06:58最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 20:44库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,727 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-14 06:56(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15506

KernelAudit: Contract-Aware Auditing of Validators for LLM-Generated GPU Kernels

Ziyuan Li, Zihe Song, Xiaofang Qi, Wei Yang, Tao Xie

原文摘要

The effectiveness of generating GPU kernels driven by a large language model (LLM) is highly dependent on the quality of the used validator (used to accept or reject a generated kernel candidate against the contracts of the given kernel-generation task), whose results inform reward assignment, candidate selection, and speedup claims during kernel generation. However, an existing validator suffers from various limitations, e.g., wrongly accepting a candidate due to missing its forbidden library use or wrongly rejecting a candidate due to determining its permitted library use as forbidden (constraints on library uses are stated in the task contracts). To assess the quality of a validator against the given task contracts, we propose an independent-audit approach for the validator by (1) construction of audit oracle: labeling a candidate as PASS or FAIL based on three separate dimensions in our proposed contract model (i.e., semantic correctness, implementation integrity, and measurement integrity) and (2) auditing of the validator against the audit oracle: comparing the labels of the candidate against the validation results produced by the validator. For semantic correctness, reference-calibrated stress tests check output correctness on valid inputs for a candidate. For implementation integrity, reference and candidate execution traces are used to determine specific library uses. For measurement integrity, timing checks assess whether the reported runtime reflects the full time needed to complete the candidate's computation. We apply our approach to assess the quality of six validators and 716 candidates from seven corpora, including constructed controls. The evaluation results show that our approach helps assess the existing six validators to have nontrivial false-reject rates. There is high-degree agreement between the candidate labels produced by our audit oracle and human judgments.

cs.SE

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15441

KernelMutate: Mutation-Guided Validation of Generated GPU Kernels

Ziyuan Li, Zihe Song, Shuxiao Xie, Mingfang Ji, Xiaofang Qi, Wei Yang, Tao Xie

原文摘要

Generated GPU implementations are commonly accepted after a few differential tests, although replacement obligations may remain unchecked. We present KernelMutate, an empirical study of validation reliability using controlled faults, released implementations, and replacement tests. A five-draw anchor accepts 548 of 838 CUDA candidates. The full suite finds native FP32 witnesses for 136 accepted candidates and dtype-only findings for another 362, mostly low-precision execution limitations without established publisher guarantees. Source-guided testing identifies the full suite's 692 candidates at 26.1% lower charged cost, but yields only dtype evidence for 16 accepted candidates with native witnesses in the full suite. Independently observed context and boundary findings cover the same candidate set. Task-held-out template matching reveals differences in ranking and observation coverage: global top-eight recommendations match more probes than class-conditioned lists (51 versus 48 of 75), while conditional analyses restrict the apparent advantage at smaller limits. These template-matching results are offline measurements, not deployed-suite gains. Independent controls and replacement cases expose numerical-policy, binding, and custom-execution boundaries. Validation therefore needs to report witness domains and observation coverage alongside candidate yield and cost.

cs.SE