跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2093新增论文
+1639其中 AI 相关
+186已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 13:10 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 13:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 13:11 — 2026-11-11 13:11(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 13:10最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 13:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,672 已收录论文18,320 AI 相关6,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 13:06(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11024

Phase-Conditioned Reward Shaping for Token-Efficient LLM Reasoning

Zhe Chen, Xiaolin Zhou, Xiyang Hu

原文摘要

Extended reasoning can help language models solve complex problems, but long responses often contain both useful computations and redundant checks. Conventional length penalties encourage shorter responses without distinguishing the functions of intermediate steps. We propose Phase-Conditioned Reward Shaping (PCRS), a framework that combines phase identification with training-time reward allocation. We investigate two classification routes: PCRS-H with a hidden-state classifier and PCRS-T with a frozen text classifier. Our main text classifier implementation assigns overlapping reasoning, execution, and revision labels to native chunks, then uses these labels and exact repetition to adjust existing token penalties. We compare the completed configurations on six mathematical and scientific reasoning benchmarks and examine four reward-weight settings with the text classifier. Compared with a baseline using token-level length penalties, the default text classifier configuration reduces mean response length by 3.13%; sampled Pass@1 is approximately 62.07% for both methods, while oracle Pass@16 rises from 86.08% to 87.67%. These results show how phase-informed penalty allocation can reduce output volume and improve multi-attempt coverage without inference-time classification.

cs.LG · cs.AI

版本更新 · v3arXiv:2605.11928

AgentRobustBench: A Sim-to-Real Benchmark and Domain-Randomized RL Recipe for Tool-Use Agents

Xiaolin Zhou, Aojie Yuan, Zheng Luo, Zipeng Ling, Xixiao Pan, Yicheng Gao, Haiyue Zhang, Jiate Li 等 15 位作者

原文摘要

Tool-use language agents are evaluated on benchmarks that assume clean inputs, unambiguous tool registries, and reliable APIs. Real deployments violate all these assumptions: user typos propagate into hallucinated tool names, a misconfigured request timeout can stall an agent indefinitely, and duplicate tool names across servers can freeze an SDK. We study these failures as a sim-to-real gap in the tool-use partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP), where deployment noise enters through the observation, action space, reward-relevant metadata, or transition dynamics. We introduce AgentRobustBench, a benchmark with 22 perturbation types organized by these four POMDP components, each grounded in a verified GitHub issue or documented tool-calling failure. Across 21 models from 1.5B to 32B parameters (including the closed-source o4-mini), the robustness profile is sharply uneven: observation perturbations reduce accuracy by less than 5%, while reward-relevant and transition perturbations reduce accuracy by roughly 40% and 30%, respectively; scale alone does not close these gaps. We then propose ToolRL-DR, a domain-randomization reinforcement learning (RL) recipe that trains a tool-use agent on perturbation-augmented trajectories spanning the three statically encodable POMDP components. On a 3B backbone, ToolRL-DR-Full retains roughly three-quarters of clean accuracy and reaches an aggregate perturbed accuracy comparable to open-source 14B function-calling baselines while substantially narrowing the gap to o4-mini. It closes approximately 27% of the Transition gap despite never seeing transition perturbations in training, suggesting that RL on adversarial static tool-use inputs induces a more persistent retry policy that transfers to unseen runtime failures. Code, dataset, checkpoints, and leaderboard are accessible through our GitHub repository.

cs.AI