让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

何时应在测试时进行干预？

When Should We Intervene at Test Time?

Jiahao Zhang, Xinling Wen, Liangliang Li, Yu Chen

AI 速览：PORTAL 是一个决定何时部署测试时干预、标注哪些输入以及何时停止查询的控制器，用少量标签在候选预测规则间做选择。登录阅读完整解读 →

Test-time adaptation helps a deployed model respond to changing inputs, but the same intervention can rescue one batch and damage the next. Updating normalization statistics, for example, can improve corrupted images yet fail when a batch contains mostly one class. Average accuracy hides these failures and cannot tell a model when to use an intervention. Target labels can guide this decision, but they are scarce and some choices are already clear. We introduce PORTAL, a controller that chooses when to deploy an intervention, which inputs to label, and when to stop querying. Each available prediction rule is a candidate, and its predictions are fixed before current feedback arrives. Every acquired label therefore evaluates all candidates on the same input. PORTAL combines these shared comparisons and directs queries toward candidates that can still overtake the current leader. It stops when the remaining labels cannot change the choice or when the possible accuracy gain no longer justifies another query. Our analysis links the required feedback to accuracy gaps and shared mistakes, explaining why some choices need much less evidence. Experiments show that this control turns an intervention that loses accuracy overall into a useful choice on selected batches. It prevents severe failures caused by changes in arrival order and preserves gains across complete corruption streams. When a fixed rule already works well, PORTAL uses little feedback to retain its performance. Periodic label checks reveal when past evidence needs refreshing and help the controller recover as conditions change. The acquired labels also train stronger candidates for future batches, and selection brings nearly all of their accuracy gains into deployment. The same feedback therefore improves both the choice made now and the predictions available to later batches.

RangeRectQuant: Compressing Scientific Fields for Every Future Rectangular Sum

Jiahao Zhang, Xinling Wen, Yu Chen

Scientific rasters are often stored before the regions to be measured are known. Independent pixel-error bounds can force exact integer reconstruction when one absolute error budget covers every future rectangle. Coordinated changes allow every pixel to change while every rectangular sum remains accurate. A prefix sum accumulates values from the top-left corner. Four such sums determine any rectangular total. RangeRectQuant preserves the pixel range and designated exact samples while controlling errors in prefix sums. At each row position, we characterize exactly which errors let the remaining pixels meet these constraints. These errors form a single integer interval, even when many completions exist. A backward pass finds its endpoints; a forward pass uses them to choose quantized pixels. The resulting field meets the prescribed error budget for every axis-aligned rectangle, with linear work and workspace proportional to one row. Experiments on geographically held-out built-surface and water-occurrence maps show substantial storage savings over alternatives meeting the same requirements. Data producers encode once; later users measure arbitrary rectangles without the source, re-encoding, or query-specific correction.

尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要