跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1115新增论文
+868其中 AI 相关
+86已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 12:10 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-06 12:10各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 12:39 — 2026-11-06 12:39(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 12:10最近发现新增版本:2026-11-06 12:10库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,064 已收录论文14,633 AI 相关4,019 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 12:09(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.36948

Self-Keyed In-Parameter Memorization for External Memory-Free Dialogue Recall in Frozen Language Models

XinYu Piao, Myunghoon Ryu, Joongheon Kim, Jong-Kook Kim

A large language model maintains conversational content in an external storage that is outside the model and grows as the dialogue continues. This work assumes an environment where a language model has no external memory and no prior knowledge of the future question or its answer. The motivation is to research whether a dialogue can be stored in the model parameters and later answer a question about it. This work proposes self-keyed in-parameter memorization (SKIM), a closed-form method in which the model generates its own questions about each dialogue turn and writes those questions into its parameters as the keys that later retrieve the turn's content. Generating many varied questions for each turn allows a later user question to match one even when phrased differently, and its answer is recalled from the parameters alone. Evaluated on five language models, SKIM recalls most stored dialogue turns from later user questions, and it answers from the model parameters without any external storage.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL · cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-short.65ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Temporal Leakage in Search-Engine Date-Filtered Web Retrieval: A Retrospective Forecasting Case Study

Ali El Lahib, Ying-Jieh Xia, Zehan Li, Yuxuan Wang, Xinyu Pi

Search-engine date filters are widely used to enforce pre-cutoff retrieval in retrospective evaluations of search-augmented forecasters. We show this approach is unreliable across two major search engines: auditing Google Search’s before: filter and DuckDuckGo’s date-range filter, we find that at least one retrieved page contains major post-cutoff leakage for 71% of questions on Google and 81% on DuckDuckGo, and the answer is directly revealed for 41% and 55%, respectively. Using gpt-oss-120b to forecast with these leaky documents, we demonstrate inflated prediction accuracy (Brier score 0.10 vs. 0.24 with leak-free documents). We characterize recurring leakage mechanisms, including updated articles, related-content modules, unreliable metadata, and absence-based signals, and argue that date-restricted search on these engines is insufficient for credible retrospective evaluation. We recommend stronger retrieval safeguards or evaluation on frozen, time-stamped web snapshots.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗