跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+7272新增论文
+6090其中 AI 相关
+125已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 18:27 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 19:02 — 2026-11-05 19:02(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 18:27最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 18:25(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.13249

CALQA: Conformal Screening of Forecast-Ensemble Configurations from One Mergeable State

Xiufeng Liu, Ruyu Liu, Yusen Liu, Huan Huo, Per Sieverts Nielsen

AutoML systems fit ensemble weights over model libraries; a search can score, per category, market or time pane, thousands of weightings of the quantile-averaged (Vincentized) ensemble for the narrowest conformally calibrated interval; exact calibration scores a group's rows per candidate. We present CALQA, a fixed-size integer aggregate per group and pane that stores histograms of normalised block scores at a net of weight vectors. One GROUP BY builds it; it merges by addition, retracts deletions by subtraction and scores any candidate without reading a row. We prove that its score never falls below the exact split-conformal shift and exceeds it by at most the net distance plus a grid gap; that coverage carries over to each fixed weight vector and, for i.i.d. blocks and up to a union-bound slack, to a searched weight vector deployed with the state's shift; and how small any such state can be. The state is thus a screen: it ranks all candidates, and exact recomputation re-checks the top 100. On five public panels (604 groups, 10,000 candidates each) this two-stage plan matches exact search on held-out blocks (99.95% of its Winkler score), 1.3-59 times faster. On two real panels of about $10^8$ rows (smart meters, retail sales) it is 44-54 times faster at 99.98-100.01% of that score and beats sample screens with the same re-check in regret at less total time. Picks deployed with their exact shift need a held-out coverage check. The state does not pay off for small or greedy searches, off-net weights at ample memory or full twelve-member support.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.DB
arXiv ↗PDF ↗