跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-14 20:22 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-13 21:09 — 2026-11-14 21:09(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-14 20:22最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-14 20:20(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16063

Vocabulary-Free Next-Event Prediction on Temporal Graphs

Zhishang Luo, Venu Madhav Tammali, Amila Weerasinghe, Osso Vahabzadeh, Olcay Boz, Xue Hao, Yusu Wang

原文摘要

Autoregressive transformer training through next-token prediction has driven remarkable advances in language modeling and has become increasingly effective for time-series modeling. Yet its success in temporal graph learning remains limited, and most temporal link-prediction methods are discriminative rather than autoregressive. While temporal graphs can have a natural serialization through chronological ordering edges, they lack an obvious graph-independent tokenization: existing node tokenization often uses a vocabulary that grows with the number of nodes, limiting scalability and cross-graph training. We propose GTGT, Generative Temporal Graph Transformer, a simple yet powerful vocabulary-free framework for self-supervised next-event prediction on temporal graphs. It predicts events for observed destinations, behavioral descriptors for novel destinations, and time gaps before new event. These targets have shared meanings across graphs, allowing one transformer to train across disjoint node sets without node-specific learned parameters. Local node identifiers let attention capture graph structure: Theoretically, we can show that our transformer-based model has the capacity for time-respecting message passing mechanisms. On Temporal Graph Benchmark (TGB), our GTGT not only achieves comparable or better link-prediction performance than established baselines, but also has much lower training cost. These results open the door to temporal graph pretraining for forecasting and other downstream tasks, providing a concrete step toward temporal graph foundation models.

cs.LG

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1754ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Revealing Procedural Reasoning Structures in Chain-of-Thought Training via Span-Level Gradient Organization

Jia Liu South China University of Technology, Pazhou Laboratory and Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jiaxin Luo, Weiwen Xu Alibaba Group, Jonathan M. Garibaldi The University of Nottingham Ningbo China and University of Nottingham, Xiao-Kun Wu Renmin University of China, Yixue Hao, Min Chen South China University of Technology and Pazhou Laboratory

原文摘要

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting enables large language models to produce multi-step reasoning, yet how such reasoning-related structure is expressed during training remains poorly understood. We present Gradient-based Structural Developer (GSD), an unsupervised framework with a principled gradient aggregation view that tracks span-level gradient during fine-tuning on reasoning benchmarks to understand how models develop structured, step-by-step reasoning capabilities. Our analysis shows that while gradients at the level of individual tokens are often noisy, aggregating gradients over contiguous reasoning-related spans reveals stable and recurring directional alignment across samples. We refer to these directionally aligned patterns as aligned sequential stresses, reflecting consistent gradient organization associated with similar reasoning procedures. Beyond capturing semantically similar reasoning instances, such gradient alignment also reveals structurally similar but semantically diverse cases that share common procedural organization. These findings position GSD as a diagnostic framework for analyzing how procedural reasoning structures emerge during training, with downstream selection results serving as auxiliary evidence correlating gradient alignment with adaptation efficiency.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表