跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 18:41 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 18:49 — 2026-11-08 18:49(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 18:41最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 18:39(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05900

Weaver: Weaving Preference Evidence through Incremental Reasoning for Personalized Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Linyao Zheng, Zhifang Mao, Xuhang Shi

原文摘要

Personalized retrieval-augmented generation requires extracting and applying user preferences from extended interaction histories. This task is challenging because preference evidence is scattered across past conversations and remains bound to specific temporal and situational contexts. Consequently, isolated fragments rarely provide complete support for a response, while preferences expressed under different conditions are easily conflated. To address these limitations, we propose Weaver, a framework that incrementally weaves memory-conditioned retrieval trajectories with compositional preference reasoning for personalized responses. Weaver operates on a Dual-Layer Retrieval and Reasoning Graph that couples an upper Intent Dependency Graph with a lower Memory-Conditioned Retrieval Trajectory Graph. Dependency Information Gap Tracking represents the information needed to answer the current request and its prerequisite dependencies in the upper graph. Memory-Conditioned Incremental Retrieval uses established premises and clues from retrieved conversations to locate missing evidence, recording the resulting retrieval trajectories in the lower graph. Scope-Aware Compositional Reasoning jointly interprets the accumulated evidence to determine which preferences apply to the request. It identifies complementary and alternative support and distinguishes conflicting claims within the same temporal and situational context. These conclusions iteratively update task premises and remaining information gaps, guiding subsequent retrieval to establish a coherent contextual basis for the final response. Experiments on personalized RAG benchmarks, particularly PersonaMem, demonstrate that Weaver outperforms leading baselines in both evidence completeness and answer quality.

cs.IR