让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

原文摘要

As modern text-to-speech systems become increasingly intelligible and natural, evaluation is shifting from detecting gross synthesis failures to identifying subtle departures from lifelike human delivery. Because large-scale listening tests are costly and slow, speech reward models can serve as scalable automatic judges for comparing generated utterances, curating data, and supporting iterative TTS development. Existing speech reward models can predict scores or pairwise preferences and may generate natural-language rationales, but their supervision is typically defined at the utterance or pair level. The connection between local acoustic phenomena and the final preference therefore remains implicit. We introduce REAL, a framework for Reward modeling through Evidence-linked Analysis of Lifelikeness in generated speech. Its central idea is to supervise not only the final pairwise preference but also a structured account of its supporting observations, linking local audio spans to perceptual phenomena, affected dimensions, and the overall judgment. Specifically, REAL-Jury constructs these evidence-linked reports through timestamp alignment, multi-model analysis, and dispute-oriented deliberation. REAL-Judge learns to generate them from paired audio inputs. REAL-Eval assesses preference prediction in two tiers, from salient perceptual differences to subtle distinctions among strong TTS systems. Instantiated with MiMo-Audio, REAL-Judge improves pairwise preference accuracy over its backbone by 16.01 and 11.41 percentage points on the two tiers, respectively, and outperforms the open-source speech reward models SpeechJudge and UniSRM on both tiers.