跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+7272新增论文
+6090其中 AI 相关
+125已有论文修订
+121新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 22:41 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 23:34 — 2026-11-05 23:34(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 22:41最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 22:35(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2508.01128

When Reviews Are Scarce: Structure-Aware Review Imputation for Recommendation in Realistic Sparse Review Settings

Leyao Wang, Xutao Mao, Qinwen Ge, Xuhui Zhan, Yuying Zhao, Bo Ni, Ryan A. Rossi, Nesreen K. Ahmed 等 9 位作者

Textual reviews enrich recommender systems with fine-grained preference signals and enhanced explainability. However, in real-world scenarios, users rarely leave reviews, resulting in severe sparsity that undermines the effectiveness of review-aware recommenders under partial observability. A natural remedy is to synthesize the missing reviews to restore the textual signal these recommenders rely on. Yet, conventional imputation techniques, such as matrix completion and LLM-based augmentation, either lose contextualized semantics by embedding texts into vectors or overlook structural dependencies on the user-item graph. To address these shortcomings, we propose TWISTER (ToWards Imputation on Sparsity with Textual Edge Graph Representation), a unified framework for sparse-text recommendation that synthesizes missing reviews by jointly modeling semantic and structural signals. Specifically, we represent user-item interactions as a Textual-Edge Graph (TEG), treating reviews as edge attributes. To capture relational context, we construct line-graph views and employ an LLM as a graph-aware aggregator. For each interaction lacking a textual review, our model aggregates natural-language representations from neighboring interactions to generate a coherent and personalized review. Experiments on multiple datasets show that TWISTER consistently outperforms traditional numeric, graph-based, and LLM baselines, delivering higher-quality imputed reviews and, more importantly, improved downstream recommendation. In summary, TWISTER is a drop-in, structure-aware imputer that recovers the textual signal that review-aware recommenders need when reviews are scarce.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.IR · cs.AI · cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2607.20827

Auditing Provenance Sensitivity in LLM Agent Action Selection

Junchi Liao, Qiang Huang, Rui Qian, Xutao Mao, Juntao Cheng, Kangning Cui, Yu Li, Jingyu Sun 等 9 位作者

LLM agents choose tools and arguments from context that mixes user requests, tool outputs, retrieved records, memory, and untrusted text. Evidence can be relevant without being authorized to determine a decision, so a correct action need not be grounded only in permitted evidence. We introduce a target-specific authorization audit that labels context factors separately for each tool and argument target. Its primary test holds the task, proposition, position, and policy fixed while changing only the proposition's source authority. We then test behavior when valid evidence is weakened and use context-subset interactions as a secondary localization diagnostic. Across 450 controlled next-action tasks and multiple open-weight LLM families, trusted and untrusted variants produce different actions in 5.4 percent of competing cases versus 1.7 percent of supporting cases. Under controlled degradation, unauthorized competition is retained in a full-correct, mixed-error, clean-correct pattern in 2.4 percent of comparisons, with a 95 percent confidence interval from 2.1 to 3.0 percent. These are controlled stress-set rates, not deployment prevalence. The models respond to textual source-authority cues, but this does not prevent untrusted evidence from influencing their actions.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗