跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1115新增论文
+868其中 AI 相关
+86已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 12:10 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-06 12:10各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 12:54 — 2026-11-06 12:54(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 12:10最近发现新增版本:2026-11-06 12:10库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,064 已收录论文14,633 AI 相关4,019 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 12:09(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05725

Faster Approximate Text-to-Pattern Hamming Distances via Near-Optimal Sumset Estimation

Nick Fischer, Yael Kirkpatrick, Vasileios Nakos

\emph{Text-to-Pattern Hamming Distances} is one of the most studied problems in string algorithms: given a text $T$ of length~$n$ and a pattern~$P$, the task is to compute the Hamming distance between~$P$ and every length-$|P|$ substring of~$T$. As exact algorithms have been stuck at time~$\tilde O(n^{3/2})$ for decades, a long line of work has turned to the $(1+ε)$-approximate version of the problem. Milestones include Karloff's $\tilde O(ε^{-2} n)$-time algorithm [IPL '93], followed by randomized improvements to $\tilde O(ε^{-1} n)$ by Kopelowitz and Porat [FOCS '15] and recently to $\tilde O(ε^{-0.915} n)$ by Chan, Jin, Vassilevska W., and Xu [FOCS '23]. In this work, we significantly improve this bound to $\tilde O(ε^{-2/3} n)$, using a considerably simpler algorithm. Our algorithm follows the framework of Chan, Jin, Vassilevska W., and Xu, which reduces the problem to a variant of 3SUM that we call \emph{Sumset Estimation}. We solve Sumset Estimation optimally (up to logarithmic factors) by replacing their matrix multiplication techniques with ideas from sparse recovery. Specifically, we adapt the classic Count Sketch by replacing its random signs with random complex roots of unity---a simple idea that may find further applications for other additive problems. Finally, we give evidence that our running time might in fact be optimal: we show that the $ε^{-2/3}$ dependence is \emph{best possible} for a certain natural class of algorithms, including ours and all previous algorithms.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.DS
arXiv ↗PDF ↗