跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科，以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词，把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描：2026-11-09 14:26 · 全站最近入库：2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 15:17 — 2026-11-09 15:17（北京时间） · 点击数字查看对应简报；AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查：2026-11-09 14:26最近发现新增版本：2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间：2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常；新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

研究日报 / 周报 →按信源浏览 →

时间范围跟随排序：版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常，查看状态 →

找到 6 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 14:25（北京时间）
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2604.01025

Fast and Accurate Probing of In-Training LLMs' Downstream Performances

Zhichen Liu, Tianle Lun, Yang Xu, Zhibin Wen, Hao An, Yulin Ou, Jianhui Xu, Hao Zhang 等 10 位作者

原文摘要

The paradigm of scaling Large Language Models (LLMs) in both parameter size and test time has pushed the boundaries of AI capabilities, but at the cost of making the traditional generative evaluation paradigm prohibitively expensive, therefore making the latency of LLM's in-training downstream performance evaluation unbearable. However, simple metrics like training loss (perplexity) are not always correlated with downstream performance, as sometimes their trends diverge from the actual task outcomes. This dilemma calls for a method that is computationally efficient and sufficiently accurate in measuring model capabilities. To address this challenge, we introduce a new in-training evaluation paradigm that uses a lightweight probe for monitoring downstream performance. The probes take the internal representations of LLM checkpoints (during training) as input and directly predict the checkpoint's performance on downstream tasks measured by success probability (i.e., pass@1). We design several probe architectures, validating their effectiveness using the OLMo3-7B's, OLMo3-32B's, and Apertus-8B's checkpoints across a diverse set of downstream tasks. The probes can accurately predict a checkpoint's performance (with avg. AUROC$>$0.75), have decent generalizability across checkpoints (earlier predicts later), and reduce the computation latency from $\sim$1 hr (using conventional generative evaluation method) to $\sim$3 min. In sum, this work presents a practical and scalable in-training downstream evaluation paradigm, enabling a more agile, informed, and efficient LLM development process.

cs.LG · cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02551

Flat Features, Detailed Images? Simple Detail Control for Diffusion Transformers

Qingtao Yu, Zhen Wang, Jiyang Zheng, Minghao Sun, Hongdong Li, Dylan Campbell

原文摘要

Prompt engineering is commonly used to encourage text-to-image models to generate more detailed images. However, it does not provide reliable, continuous, or disentangled control. We analyze feature tokens produced with and without detail-enhancing prompts across six diffusion transformers and observe a common pattern: these prompts tend to increase the entropy of each token's energy distribution while largely preserving its ordering. That is, flattening the distribution increases the level of detail. Motivated by this counter-intuitive finding, we introduce a simple training-free approach that continuously adjusts the level of detail according to a scalar. Specifically, it shifts the squared channel magnitudes of each token toward a higher entropy distribution with a time-aware scheduler to concentrate the intervention at intermediate sampling steps. Across extensive experiments on different types of diffusion transformers, we show that our approach provides continuous control over detail metrics while largely preserving image quality and semantic structure. It requires only a few lines of code and adds negligible inference time overhead.

cs.CV

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02438

As Expected? Efficient LLM Planning via Expectation-Observation Consistency Verification

Qingfu Zhu, Huanyang Zheng, Ting Liu, Wanxiang Che

原文摘要

LLM planning often relies on reactive executors (e.g., ReAct) that generate a single action at each step to remain grounded in the latest observations, incurring substantial inference cost. Batched executors reduce this cost by predicting multiple actions in a single model invocation, yet they are prone to compounding errors, as intermediate observations are ignored. We propose an expectation-observation consistency verification (EOCV) mechanism for batched executors, preserving grounding while improving efficiency. The mechanism generates expectations of action outcomes and compares them with the resulting observations. Consistency permits continued execution, whereas mismatches trigger early termination and replanning from the current observation. Experiments on text-based and multimodal benchmarks across multiple backbones show broadly comparable average task performance between EOCV and reactive executors, with a 29-35% reduction in average weighted token usage. Moreover, the mechanism is model-agnostic and remains effective when integrated into state-of-the-art planners.

cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.39417

Well-Specified and Well-Tested? Assessing SWE-bench-Style Datasets with a Self-Evolving Agent

Zhonghao Jiang, Xuyang Zheng, Yanfu Yan, Zhongxin Liu, Lingfeng Bao, Shuiguang Deng

原文摘要

Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance on software engineering (SE) tasks, driving the need for high-quality datasets for reliable training and evaluation. SWE-bench-style datasets (SWE datasets) are widely used to evaluate LLM-based coding agents on real-world software issues, where task clarity and test coverage directly affect whether instances are solvable and verifiable. However, quality issues persist in existing SWE datasets, and manual annotation is costly and labor-intensive, motivating LLM-based annotation. Existing approaches typically rely on static, overly general rubrics, limiting their ability to handle diverse and nuanced scenarios and often yielding high false positive rates. In contrast, human annotators draw on accumulated experience to make context-aware judgments. Inspired by this, we propose ExLabel, an LLM-based, self-evolving, experience-guided assistant for task clarity and test coverage assessment in SWE datasets. ExLabel maintains an evolving experience bank that distills cross-instance knowledge into stable yet adaptive judgment criteria and reuses relevant experience to guide the assessment of new instances. For systematic evaluation, we construct SWE-TQ, a new benchmark spanning eight programming languages, by cleaning human annotations from SWE-bench and Multi-SWE-bench. Experiments with three backbone LLMs show that ExLabel achieves the best F1 across all settings, with relative improvements of 44.2%/49.9% and 24.0%/18.4% over the best baseline for task clarity and test coverage assessment on the Python/Multilingual subsets, respectively. Moreover, a coding model fine-tuned on SWE-rebench data filtered by ExLabel resolves 66.2% of issues on SWE-bench Verified, outperforming the model trained on data filtered by the best baseline by 14.5%.

cs.SE · cs.AI · cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.17690

MedEvo: Medical Reasoning Evolution through Knowledge Navigation

Xiaoliang Wang, Zhuo Chen, Chuanyang Zheng, Quanbin Wang, Jiangwei Lao, Yingao Liu, Jiajia Liu, Jinming Cao 等 14 位作者

原文摘要

Medical multimodal reasoning models are typically trained on teacher-generated rationales, discarding the valid reasoning in students' own failed trajectories, while general-domain correction methods offer little guidance for errors in image reading, anatomical context, or differential diagnosis. We propose MedEvo, which uses medical knowledge, namely a tag taxonomy and error-type diagnosis, to navigate both trajectory repair and data selection. For each failed rollout, a gold-blind auditor locates the first consequential error and provides a minimal, answer-free hint; the same student retains the valid prefix and regenerates the erroneous suffix. After each round, MedEvo identifies capability gaps across medical tags on a held-out feedback set and prioritizes related questions for new rollouts and repairs. With supervised fine-tuning (SFT) alone, MedEvo raises Qwen3.5-9B mean accuracy across seven benchmarks from 65.57% to 69.12% (47.40% to 54.50% on the multimodal track of MedXpertQA (MedXpertQA-MM)), surpassing teacher-distillation SFT (66.93%). It also raises Qwen3.5-35B and Qwen3.5-397B mean accuracy from 67.91% to 73.04% and from 71.83% to 74.95%, respectively. Our analyses show that failed trajectories contain reasoning worth preserving, that repair success does not imply learning value, and that independent feedback is key to sustained improvement.

cs.AI · cs.CV · cs.LG · q-bio.QM

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.17718

ECG-RSI: Recursive Self-Improvement through Targeted Electrocardiogram Waveform Evolution

Xiaoliang Wang, Zhuo Chen, Chuanyang Zheng, Jiangwei Lao, Quanbin Wang, Honglin Lin, Jiajia Liu, Zhihong Lu 等 12 位作者

原文摘要

Electrocardiogram (ECG) models need supervision that targets evolving weaknesses and remains faithful to waveform evidence. We introduce ECG-RSI, a recursive self-improvement framework combining verified waveform synthesis with feedback-guided intervention search. Signal remeasurement verifies waveform edits; construction errors guide generator repair, while learner errors motivate interventions compared on a separate selection set. Across seven benchmarks, three rounds raise Qwen3.5-35B-A3B's mean question-answering accuracy from 34.57% to 56.04% and mean classification F1 from 24.27 to 34.03. Across the retained trajectory, the preferred supervision shifts from direct reinforcement to confusion-focused contrasts. Continued feedback correction yields diminishing external gains. These results motivate separating error diagnosis from intervention selection and checking whether gains on the feedback set transfer to independent benchmarks.

cs.AI · cs.LG · eess.SP · q-bio.QM

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗