跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1151新增论文
+896其中 AI 相关
+86已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-07 07:03 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-06 13:12各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-06 07:49 — 2026-11-07 07:49(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-07 07:03最近发现新增版本:2026-11-06 13:12库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-07 07:01(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02349

APG: Agentic Static-Analysis Infrastructure on LLVM-IR Graph Databases

Zexin Zhong, Yanjun Zhang, Yulei Sui, Xiao Cheng

LLM-based coding agents increasingly rely on external program knowledge, yet access to static-analysis graphs alone does not ensure appropriate operation selection or evidence interpretation. We present APG, an infrastructure for semantics-grounded static program analysis. Built on SVF and LLVM, it decomposes compiler-derived program analyses into atomic capabilities that LLM agents can select, compose, and orchestrate for goal-directed, cross-graph investigation, with query safeguards and evidence traces preserving inspectable results and provenance. APG provides 38 atomic capabilities. On analysis requests arising during benchmark repair runs, 35 achieve first-attempt query-generation success rates above 50%, including 13 at 100%. Evaluation on 812 C/C++ defects shows higher repair success than the evaluated baselines. Compared with Passive Graph Push, APG improves first-iteration repair success by 17.6 and 18.0 percentage points on the two benchmark collections and reduces average LLM input-token consumption by 90.8%. Our tool is available at https://github.com/JasonZhongZexin/APG-ICSE-Demo and its demonstration video at https://youtu.be/vkuExZUjGnw

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.SE
arXiv ↗PDF ↗