Coding agents are increasingly used in real-world workflows across diverse domains, motivating evaluation grounded in real user tasks. Existing benchmarks, however, largely rely on static public tasks with reference patches or hidden tests. Next-generation coding-agent benchmarks should therefore move beyond correctness on fixed tasks toward continually renewed evaluation of overall artifact quality in real user workflows. We propose Trace2Eval, a dynamically updatable pipeline that constructs benchmarks from real-world interaction trajectories. Trace2Eval employs a multi-agent reconstruction system to analyze the filtered trajectory, recover the original user query, restore the workspace files to their pre-interaction state, and rebuild a trajectory-equivalent execution environment. A candidate agent then executes the reconstructed query to produce an initial artifact. To evaluate these artifacts, the pipeline iteratively refines human rubrics through inter-annotator alignment, and calibrates judge agents against human assessments using source-code and runtime evidence. Guided by feedback from the Trace2Eval pipeline, models revise their initial artifacts, yielding a mean score gain of 10.05 percentage points across 19 model-harness configurations and a maximum of 19.28 percentage points for DeepSeek-V4-Pro with Claude Code, which supports rubric feedback as actionable guidance for artifact improvement.
Lingyue Fu, Hao Guan, Bolun Zhang, Haowei Yuan, Yaoming Zhu, Lin Qiu, ZongYu Wang Meituan, Xuezhi Cao Meituan 等 12 位作者
The evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) for software engineering has shifted towards complex, repository-level tasks. However, existing benchmarks predominantly rely on coarse-grained pass rates that treat programming proficiency as a monolithic capability, obscuring specific cognitive bottlenecks. Furthermore, the static nature of these benchmarks renders them vulnerable to data contamination and performance saturation. To address these limitations, we introduce CoreCodeBench, a configurable repository-level benchmark designed to dissect coding capabilities through atomized tasks. Leveraging our automated framework, CorePipe, we extract and transform Python repositories into a comprehensive suite of tasks that isolate distinct cognitive demands within identical code contexts. Unlike static evaluations, CoreCodeBench supports controllable difficulty scaling to prevent saturation and ensures superior data quality. It achieves a 78.55% validity yield, significantly surpassing the 31.7% retention rate of SWE-bench-Verified. Extensive experiments with state-of-the-art LLMs reveal a significant capability misalignment, evidenced by distinct ranking shifts across cognitive dimensions. This indicates that coding proficiency is non-monolithic, as strength in one aspect does not necessarily translate to others. These findings underscore the necessity of our fine-grained taxonomy in diagnosing model deficiencies and offer a sustainable, rigorous framework for evolving code intelligence. Code of CorePipe framework and data of CoreCodeBench are available in https://github.com/AGI-Eval-Official/CoreCodeBench and https://huggingface.co/collections/tubehhh/corecodebench.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表