跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 21:48 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 21:53 — 2026-11-08 21:53(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 21:48最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 21:46(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02974

Memory Admission and Result-Retention Sizing in an RV32IMC FPGA Soft Processor

Yihang Dai, Shuyu Xu, Yinfeng Zhou, Chenglei Peng

原文摘要

In FPGA soft processors with shared backing block RAM, memory admission can stall a multiplication after its product has been prepared. We study how admission timing changes result retention in PaceRV, our board-tested five-stage RV32IMC core, using fixed binaries and matched dynamic instructions. Offering data requests one edge earlier reduces geometric-mean Embench cycles by 18.2% and retention opportunities from 375,063 to 4,373. Admission and retention cycle gains are conditional and non-additive. Under slower reads, a 99% capture target selects an 18-edge validity window with registered requests and 28 edges with early requests, although no multiplication matched within both measurement intervals waits longer. A predeclared sizing rule predicts opportunity recovery exactly in all finite tests, including kernels excluded from model development. Independent timing analysis closely estimates execution-cycle savings. The results support choosing admission first, then deciding whether to extend validity and sizing it against an explicit capture or missed-opportunity objective.

cs.AR