跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+441新增论文
+336其中 AI 相关
+91已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 11:04 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 12:03 — 2026-11-12 12:03(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 11:04最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 11:02(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2605.15790

Fairness-Aware Retrieval Optimization for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Yingqi Zhao, Vasilis Efthymiou, Jyrki Nummenmaa, Kostas Stefanidis

原文摘要

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) grounds large language models (LLMs) in external knowledge, but the retrieved documents can systematically skew generated answers toward one group. This effect is difficult to analyze and control in top-k settings, where several documents at different context positions jointly shape the output. We present a three-stage framework for fairness-aware retrieval in top-k RAG. First, a probabilistic reranker sets the group composition of the retrieved context at each position, enabling controlled perturbation of retrieval bias without modifying the retriever. Second, we show that output bias is well approximated by a position-weighted linear function of position-wise retrieval bias, revealing model-specific positional sensitivities. Third, we use this model to formulate retrieval as an optimization problem that trades off relevance against predicted output bias, and propose FARO, a scalable solution to that problem which decomposes the globally coupled quadratic objective into independent per-query assignment problems through a Fenchel--Legendre dual reformulation. Experiments with four open LLMs, and political and gender bias as use cases show that the linear model predicts output bias on unseen configurations in 17 of 24 settings. FARO substantially reduces output bias in most settings, while, compared with a linear-programming baseline, FARO achieves similar relevance, remains feasible where the baseline does not, and scales better to larger query sets and candidate pools.

cs.DB · cs.IR