跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+6403新增论文
+5442其中 AI 相关
+112已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 10:10 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 10:10各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 10:37 — 2026-11-05 10:37(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 10:10最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 10:10库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 12:53

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,080 已收录论文13,117 AI 相关3,141 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 10:08(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02539

Scientific Liquidity Agents: An Agent-Based Model of Knowledge Arbitrage in Scientific Communities

Koutian Wu, You Liu, Yue Liu, Zhiping Li, Ergan Shang

Scientific knowledge gains new uses when ideas, methods, and results move between research contexts. Understanding this process requires a model of both specialized knowledge production and the intermediary activities that connect it. We introduce Scientific Liquidity Agents (SLA), an agent-based model of knowledge arbitrage in scientific communities. SLA represents domain specialists and epistemic arbitrageurs within a shared environment of research problems, researcher interactions, and scientific artifacts. Individual decisions connect to collective state through a belief-desire-intention architecture, a prerequisite-based problem graph, a dynamic interaction network, and a persistent publication registry. The framework makes researcher roles and knowledge-transfer frictions explicit, providing a process-oriented account of scientific production and exchange. Two exploratory simulations with 10 and 18 agents produce 68 and 274 registered papers. In the smaller run, arbitrageurs take part in 16 of the 26 contact pairs that join this community into one connected component, while topical similarity alone splits it into seven. The same run yields three similarity edges, 26 contact pairs, and two coauthorship pairs, so measured community structure depends on what counts as a link. Paper production is abundant, but no recorded replication succeeds, which places the bottleneck in verification rather than production. Solved-problem sets correspond to the prerequisite reachability of the disciplines represented in each community. SLA makes knowledge liquidity, the movement and reuse of artifacts across domains, a quantity that agentic science can simulate and measure.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.MA · cs.AI · cs.SI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.34824

SPARTA: A Sparse Ternary LLM Accelerator with Adaptive Attention and Unified Datapath for Long-Context Edge Inference

Yanzhen Zhou, Zhengyu Han, Qunyou Liu, Zheyu Yan, Weihong Xu, Cheng Zhuo

LLMs on edge devices are constrained by limited memory and bandwidth. Although 1.58-bit ternary weights greatly reduce model storage, long-context inference is increasingly bottlenecked by KV-cache traffic and attention. Existing accelerators also use separate datapaths for ternary linear layers and attention, incurring hardware and execution overhead. We present SPARTA, a sparse ternary LLM accelerator for efficient long-context edge inference. SPARTA integrates: (1) a phase-aware sparse dataflow exploiting heterogeneous sparsity across compute-bound prefill and memory-bound decode; (2) a unified compute fabric mapping ternary SpMM/SpMV and bit-serial attention onto shared processing elements to exploit zero-weight and zero-bit sparsity; and (3) an adaptive two-stage attention engine combining page-level Top-k selection to reduce K-cache accesses with token-level Top-p pruning to reduce V-cache traffic. SPARTA reduces KV traffic by 4.1-4.8x over full attention and 1.3-1.5x over a state-of-the-art sparse-attention scheme, with task-dependent quality loss. Compared with NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin, SPARTA achieves 3.9x higher generation throughput and 8.3x higher end-to-end energy efficiency on average; versus AMD Ryzen 7 9700X, the gains are 5.0x and 81.7x. It also delivers 1.6-12.0x higher throughput, 2.0-4.2x higher energy efficiency, and 1.3-51.4x higher area efficiency than FIGLUT, TeLLMe, and MCBP.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.AR · cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗