Does effective swimming with multiple underactuated soft arms require explicit coordination between arms? We hypothesize that an eight-arm swimmer can control its swimming speed and direction by independently learning each arm's actuation amplitude under a shared rhythmic drive, without prescribed inter-arm phase coupling. To test this hypothesis, we compare three reinforcement learning-based control strategies using proximal policy optimization (PPO): (1) learning arm-specific actuation amplitudes without inter-arm phase coupling, (2) learning actuation amplitudes with prescribed inter-arm phase coupling, and (3) directly learning actuator commands through end-to-end PPO without an explicit rhythmic structure. Across 200 episodes with randomized three-dimensional velocity commands, the controller without phase coupling satisfies the tracking criterion in 169 episodes, compared with 117 for the phase-coupled controller and 28 for end-to-end PPO. Straight-line swimming and commanded direction-change trials further demonstrate more accurate velocity tracking without phase coupling. These findings suggest that effective eight-arm swimming does not require prescribed inter-arm phase coupling, but can instead be achieved through learned arm-specific amplitude modulation within a rhythmic control structure.
Yefan Zeng, Shengyu Duan, Rishad Shafik, Alex Yakovlev
The Tsetlin Machine (TM) is a logic-based machine learning model well suited to low-latency inference on resource-constrained edge devices. Because each clause is an AND over Boolean literals, both the literals and their associated Tsetlin Automaton (TA) actions can be represented at the bit level, enabling bitwise evaluation and an early exit that is triggered as soon as any included literal evaluates to zero, forcing the clause output to zero. In this work, we study how the two TM training hyperparameters, T and s, govern both classification accuracy and inference latency. Building on the inversely proportional T-s relationship along which accuracy is nearly constant, we find that inference latency is reduced primarily by increasing s; rather than exhaustively searching the (T, s) grid at high training cost, we propose a directed search strategy that treats accuracy as a constraint and advances toward larger s to reduce inference latency within a fixed evaluation budget. Experimental results on the gem5 simulator with an ARM processor show that, for certain datasets, the search is able to increase s while preserving the baseline accuracy, thereby reducing inference latency at negligible accuracy cost: across six datasets, the method reduces inference latency by up to 16.34%, while some datasets exhibit an accuracy reduction of only 0.06%. The proposed strategy requires far fewer configuration evaluations than an exhaustive grid search.
The ability of large language models (LLMs) to manage and acquire economic resources remains unclear. In this paper, we introduce Market-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates the capabilities of LLMs in economically-relevant tasks through economic and trade competition. Specifically, we construct a configurable multi-agent supply chain economic model where LLMs act as retailer agents responsible for procuring and retailing merchandise. In the procurement stage, LLMs bid for limited inventory in budget-constrained auctions. In the retail stage, LLMs set retail prices, generate marketing slogans, and provide them to buyers through a role-based attention mechanism for purchase. Market-Bench logs complete trajectories of bids, prices, slogans, sales, and balance-sheet states, enabling automatic evaluation with economic, operational, and semantic metrics. Benchmarking on 20 open- and closed-source LLM agents reveals significant performance disparities and winner-take-most phenomenon, i.e., only a small subset of LLM retailers can consistently achieve capital appreciation, while many hover around the break-even point despite similar semantic matching scores. Market-Bench provides a reproducible testbed for studying how LLMs interact in competitive markets.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.MA
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表