跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+7272新增论文
+6090其中 AI 相关
+125已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 16:22 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 16:35 — 2026-11-05 16:35(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 16:22最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 16:20(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.01909

Who Asks, Who Answers: Linear Attention Builds the Query in Hybrid Language Models

Wenqi Zeng, Chen Feng, YuAng Chen

Hybrid language models interleave linear-attention layers with a small number of softmax-attention layers. Prior work largely attributes in-context retrieval to softmax attention, treating linear attention primarily as a mechanism for compressing past context. We revisit this division of labor and show that linear attention plays a direct role in retrieval by constructing the query used by softmax attention. Studying Qwen3.5 (Gated DeltaNet) and Granite4.0 (Mamba-2), we identify an Encode--Address circuit. An early Encode block preserves token identity, while an Address block constructs the final-position representation from which a softmax \emph{reader} forms its attention query. Transplanting this representation between prompts with different queried keys redirects retrieval in 0.97--0.99 of cases. The Address block's recurrent state carries the retrieval target, and its computation transfers across architectures: replacing Granite's Address block with Qwen's restores retrieval accuracy to 0.92--0.94 without updating either model's weights. Across six Qwen3.5 models, Address computation becomes distributed at larger scales over a chain of blocks, each guiding a successive reader, as the query no longer passes from one reader to the next through attention. These findings reveal a division of labor in hybrid retrieval: linear attention constructs the query, while softmax attention performs the lookup. Code is available at https://github.com/yuang-chen/LinearQuery

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.01831

MATE: Multi-Agent Traffic Engineering for Topology-Aware Distributed SRv6 Scheduling under Bursty Traffic

Yuang Chen, Shuyi Liu, Chengdi Lu, Fengqian Guo, Hancheng Lu, Chang Wen Chen

As network traffic becomes increasingly dynamic and bursty, conventional centralized traffic engineering (TE) suffers from long control-loop delays caused by network-state aggregation, centralized computation, and policy distribution. In this paper, we propose MATE, a multi-agent TE method for proactive distributed scheduling in hybrid networks with partial deployment of Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6). MATE uses historical traffic stability to characterize the burst risk of each traffic demand and path sensitivity to quantify the ability of candidate paths to accommodate additional traffic, thereby enabling differentiated proactive scheduling tailored to heterogeneous traffic characteristics. MATE adopts an offline-centralized training and online-distributed execution architecture. During training, a shared global critic evaluates joint actions under a reward combining maximum link utilization (MLU) with variability-weighted path sensitivity, while counterfactual difference rewards provide agent-specific credit for actor learning. During online execution, edge agents generate traffic-splitting policies from local observations and apply them through SRv6, avoiding centralized optimization in each scheduling interval. Experiments on the China Environment for Network Innovations (CENI) testbed and simulations on the Sanet topology show that MATE outperforms a multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) ablation baseline without agent-specific credit assignment, COPE, and TEAL in most evaluated scenarios and approaches centralized FIGRET on measured traffic traces. On CENI-Abilene, MATE achieves MLU within 10% of the linear-programming optimum in up to 90.1% of test instances. MATE also achieves lower median normalized MLU than FIGRET in most tested failure scenarios, with mean neural-inference times of 2.05--3.14~ms.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.NI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗