跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 22:53 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 23:33 — 2026-11-08 23:33(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 22:53最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 22:48(北京时间)
版本更新 · v5arXiv:2501.18158

大语言模型用于加密货币交易分析:比特币案例研究

Large Language Models for Cryptocurrency Transaction Analysis: A Bitcoin Case Study

Yuchen Lei, Yuexin Xiang, Tsz Hon Yuen, Andreas Deppeler, Qin Wang, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo

AI 速读 基于摘要

该论文提出三级分析框架与LLM4TG图表示、CETraS采样方法,评估五个大语言模型在真实比特币交易图上的节点信息提取、图特征识别与地址分类能力。

cs.CR · cs.LG

查看原文摘要

Cryptocurrency transaction analysis often relies on black-box machine learning models that achieve high predictive performance but offer limited interpretability of transaction behaviors. This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in analyzing real-world Bitcoin transaction graphs through a three-level framework: foundational metrics, characteristic overview, and contextual interpretation. To address token constraints, we introduce LLM4TG, a compact, human-readable graph representation, and CETraS, a connectivity-enhanced graph sampling algorithm. Experiments across five LLMs show that node-level information extraction achieves over 98.50% accuracy on most metrics, while meaningful graph characteristics are identified in up to 95.00% of responses. For address classification with limited labeled examples, top-1 accuracy reaches 50.49% using raw graphs, while top-3 accuracy reaches 72.43% using engineered features. These findings demonstrate the potential of LLMs for transaction graph analysis while revealing limitations in global graph reasoning, precise address classification, and explanation reliability.

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02530

AMLBench: A Real-Incident Benchmark for Agentic Blockchain Anti-Money Laundering

Qishuang Fu, Hang Zheng, Yuchen Lei, Yuexin Xiang, Qin Wang, Yuanzhe Zhang, Shiping Chen, Andreas Deppeler 等 11 位作者

原文摘要

Tracing illicit funds on public blockchains remains largely manual. As funds move across accounts and undergo asset conversions, they become mixed with other inflows, requiring repeated queries and expert judgment to trace. Large language model (LLM) agents offer a way to automate this process, but their ability to reconstruct case-related transfer networks from limited clues remains unclear. To bridge this gap, we present AMLBench, an anti-money laundering (AML) benchmark built from 24 real-world cases and 5.05 million Ethereum transfer records. For each case, agents start from limited clues and explore these transfer records through composable transaction-query and fund-flow analysis tools, deciding which accounts and branches to pursue. The final tracing results are evaluated against case annotations, while tool interaction logs reveal how agents discover and select relevant transfers and at what resource cost. We also develop AMLAgent, which integrates fund-tracing guidance and query feedback to dynamically guide investigative decisions. With GPT-6 Astra, AMLAgent achieves macro averages of 80.82% transfer-level precision and 84.73% query coverage across 24 real-world cases. Further analysis of the large-scale Bybit case reveals substantial differences in transfer retention and token usage across models, even with similar submission precision. AMLBench establishes a reproducible benchmark for evaluating both tracing outcomes and investigative processes, laying the groundwork for more reliable and efficient autonomous AML investigations.

cs.CE