跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1163新增论文
+868其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 07:02 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 07:29 — 2026-11-06 07:29(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 07:02最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 07:00(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.04913

EP-LVMQA: Evidence-Preserving Coarse-to-Fine Localization for Low-Quality Long Video Moment Question Answering

Guoning Chen, Zhexun Hu, Yifan Wei, Yixuan Weng, Bin Li, Yufei Zhao

Long instructional videos are increasingly used in medical education, industrial training, and procedural knowledge transfer, yet their evidence is often incomplete or unreliable: subtitles may be missing, ASR noisy, OCR sparse, and decisive actions briefly shown without narration. Existing VideoQA systems typically return labels or free-form text, making answer support difficult to inspect. We study Long Video Moment Question Answering (LVMQA), where a system returns timestamped answer-supporting evidence. We propose EP-LVMQA, an evidence-preserving coarse-to-fine framework comprising an Uncertainty-Aware Multimodal Evidence Timeline, a Coarse Evidence Planner, and an Evidence-Conditioned Fine Localizer. An evidence card transfers planner scores, matched cues, source-confidence proxies, modality-specific evidence, neighboring context, and a temporal prior between the latter two modules. On MedVidQA, EP-LVMQA achieves 26.1 R1@0.5 and 31.8 mIoU, improving the strongest non-ours results by 6.3 and 5.1 points. It raises Suff.@2 and Ver.@2 to 25.4 and 22.6, gains of 9.5 and 8.8 points. Under matched low-quality perturbations, average relative degradation is reduced from the strongest non-ours value of 14.6% to 11.1%. On Ego4D-NLQ and QVHighlights, EP-LVMQA remains broadly comparable to established task-specific localization methods.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CV
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.03468

The Optimizer's Windfall: Bounding Hindsight Gain under Random Restrictions

Xiaohui Bei, Wenhao Wu

Suppose an optimization problem is randomly restricted, independently on each variable, and re-optimized after the restriction is revealed. For multilinear objectives, every fixed solution is unbiased after rescaling, but re-optimizing introduces an upward bias. We bound this excess, the hindsight gain, over products of arbitrary compact local domains in Euclidean unit balls. For interactions $A=(A_e)_e$ among $r$ distinct variables and independent random weights $ζ_i$, the gain is at most $O_r(\|A\|_F M^{(r-1)/2}σ_{\max})$, where $\|A\|_F^2$ is the sum of squared coefficients, $M=\sum_i\mathbb{E}ζ_i^2$, and $σ_{\max}^2=\max_i\mathrm{Var}(ζ_i)$; only second moments are needed. Under uniform retention with probability $p$, we sharpen this to $O_r(p^{r-1/2}\sqrt{1-p}\,n^{(r-1)/2}\|A\|_F)$, which is tight for every fixed $r$ and $p\in(0,1)$. Our proof combines a comparison principle along a single support direction with tensor projection, vector contraction, and repeated thinning. Applications: (i) For fixed arity and alphabet size, solving the subproblem induced by $O(\varepsilon^{-2})$ sampled variables estimates a dense Max-$r$CSP optimum within $\pm\varepsilon n^r$, and this sample size is optimal. (ii) The same approach estimates MaxCut and the distance to bipartiteness within $\pm\varepsilon n^2$ using $O(\varepsilon^{-4})$ nonadaptive queries and $O(\varepsilon^{-2})$ examined vertices, both optimal. (iii) We answer a question of Yufei Zhao: vertex percolation at rate $p$ preserves the max-cut fraction whenever $p\,e(G)/v(G)\to\infty$, and this condition is sharp. (iv) For bounded $r$-local quantum Hamiltonians of fixed local dimension, $O(\varepsilon^{-3})$ uniformly sampled particles suffice to estimate the ground-state energy within $\pm\varepsilon n^r$, improving the previous $O(\varepsilon^{-6}\log(1/\varepsilon))$ bound.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.DS · cs.DM · math.CO
arXiv ↗PDF ↗