跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+3新增论文
+3其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 17:17 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 18:01 — 2026-11-12 18:01(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 17:17最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 17:15(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2611.00580

Scaling Science: Toward a Chain Reaction of Discovery

Yuheng Ding

原文摘要

Scientific discovery advances when evidence from different investigations is brought into contact. Yet paper-centric communication leaves experimental results fragmented, delayed, or unreported, creating a "scientific memory wall" between growing computational capabilities and the evidence accessible to AI systems. Breaking this wall requires a paradigm shift in AI for Science: moving from passively mining questions out of existing datasets to actively generating and recombining experimental data around unresolved scientific questions. In a network of intelligent laboratories, a failed or overlooked experiment in one domain could trigger a hypothesis in another, whose testing generates fresh evidence that stimulates further investigations. To enable these evidence-driven chain reactions, we propose Evolving Scientific Intelligence (ESI), an architectural blueprint that connects shared scientific memory with distributed experimental loops. ESI preserves experimental records -- including negative and anomalous results -- in computable representations, allowing models to recombine evidence across domains into testable hypotheses. Rather than following fixed screening pipelines, the system jointly selects candidates and evaluation methods according to scientific value, reliability, and cost, directing distributed laboratories to produce the exact evidence needed next. Their physical feedback revises both hypotheses and evaluators, while slower meta-control reassesses research objectives and decision criteria to guard against self-reinforcing errors and misguided optimization. We call for an Information Manhattan Project to build this infrastructure for scaling science through experimentally grounded chains of discovery.

cs.AI · cs.LG