跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1030新增论文
+790其中 AI 相关
+128已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 03:52 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 22:47各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 04:20 — 2026-11-12 04:20(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 03:52最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 22:47库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,673 已收录论文18,321 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 03:50(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2605.05980

TACT: Mitigating Overthinking and Overacting in Coding Agents via Activation Steering

Yuan Sui, Yulin Chen, Yibo Li, Xue Jiang, Yufei He, Yihong Dong, Xiaoxin He, Tianyu Gao 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

When language model agents tackle complex software engineering tasks, they often degrade over long trajectories, which we define as *agent drift*. We focus on two recurring failure modes *overthinking* and *overacting*, i.e., where the agent repeatedly reasons over information it already has, and where it issues tool calls without integrating recent observations or acquiring new evidence. In this paper, we introduce TACT (Think-Act Calibration via activation Steering), to detect and mitigate agent drift in the residual stream before it surfaces as a behavioral failure. In specific, we label trajectory steps as overthinking, overacting, or calibrated, and find that their hidden states can separate linearly along two *drift axes*, pointing from calibrated behavior toward each failure mode (AUC $\approx$ 0.9). To mitigate agent drift, we project each step's activation onto these axes at test time and pull drifted ones back toward the calibrated region. Experiments show that TACT outperforms unsteered baselines across SWE-bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0, and CLAW-Eval, lifting average resolve rate by $+5.8$ pp on Qwen3.5-27B and $+4.8$ pp on Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it while cutting steps-to-resolve by up to $26\%$. These gains frame agent drift as a steerable direction in the residual stream, and position TACT as a viable handle for reliable long-horizon agents.

cs.AI

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.12111

GAP: Generalized Adaptation Prior for Dexterous Piano Playing

Jinyi Chen, Hongyi Li, Lei Jiang, Xianwei Liu, Yanhong Liang, Yulin Chen, Yucheng Tao, Yongbin Jin 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Dexterous hands enable versatile manipulation, but policies trained in simulation often degrade on hardware owing to non-idealities, and the high-dimensional action space makes real-world adaptation costly. Piano playing, which requires precise and coordinated multifinger motion, offers a representative testbed. We propose GAP (Generalized Adaptation Prior for Dexterous Piano Playing), a sample-efficient adaptation framework that learns how to adapt, rather than how to act, during simulation pretraining and transfers this adaptation prior to hardware. Between repeated executions, GAP uses feedback to adjust the actions of the next one: a gradient guidance network learns from paired executions how adjusting actions affects playing performance, and its gradients guide these adjustments. In simulation, GAP yields approximately 2.4 times the F1 scores improvement of the existing fast-adaptation baseline for dexterous piano playing under the same interaction budget. The learned prior also generalizes to musical pieces held out from pretraining. On a physical dexterous hand, the same simulation-pretrained prior improves F1 scores by 3.6%-23% across three pieces of varying difficulty after approximately 7 min of adaptation each. These results suggest a practical route to reduce the real-world interaction needed to deploy dexterous hands.

cs.RO

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.294ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

ContextLens: Modeling Imperfect Privacy and Safety Context for Legal Compliance

Haoran Li, Yulin Chen National University of Singapore, Huihao Jing Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and MODEIO HOLDING COMPANY LIMITED, Wenbin Hu, Tsz Ho Li Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Chanhou Lou, Hong Ting Tsang, Sirui Han The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Individuals’ concerns about data privacy and AI safety are highly contextualized and extend beyond sensitive patterns. Addressing these issues requires reasoning about the context to identify and mitigate potential risks. Though researchers have widely explored using large language models (LLMs) as evaluators for contextualized safety and privacy assessments, these efforts typically assume the availability of complete and clear context, whereas real-world contexts tend to be ambiguous and incomplete. In this paper, we propose ContextLens, a semi-rule-based framework that leverages LLMs to ground the input context in the legal domain and explicitly identify both known and unknown factors for legal compliance. Instead of directly assessing safety outcomes, our ContextLens instructs LLMs to answer a set of crafted questions that span over applicability, general principles and detailed provisions to assess compliance with pre-defined priorities and rules. We conduct extensive experiments on existing compliance benchmarks that cover the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the EU AI Act. The results suggest that our ContextLens can significantly improve LLMs’ compliance assessment and surpass existing baselines without any training. Additionally, our ContextLens can further identify the ambiguous and missing factors.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表