跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1673新增论文
+1257其中 AI 相关
+197已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 17:24 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 14:16各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 18:12 — 2026-11-13 18:12(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 17:24最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 14:16库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,726 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 17:22(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16287

RiskLens: Human-Informed Incident Transfer for AI Risk Evaluation

Yiliu Tang, Hangyue Zhang, Yun Huang

原文摘要

As AI capabilities advance, early-stage teams need better ways to judge whether historical incidents transfer to new products, demanding support beyond static risk checklists or one-off ideation tools. We present RiskLens, a human-AI workflow with an interactive system built around a live crawl, refreshable ranker, and extensible, human-informed schema. RiskLens analyzes 2,034 AI incidents and 10,443 AI products to rank transferable incidents using a feature schema spanning technical, operational, and user-facing attributes and supports an interface that presents ranked incident evidence, generated scenarios, risk metrics, and mitigation suggestions. In a study with 21 AI-familiar participants, users surfaced evaluation criteria that we added as 13 human-informed dimensions, including harm categories, failure mechanisms, and vulnerable groups. The feature-based model outperformed a generic baseline with an 86.2% win rate, and remained stable on a twenty-month future holdout; after human-informed schema expansion, the updated model outperformed the same baseline on 91.4% of pairs.

cs.HC