跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1030新增论文
+790其中 AI 相关
+127已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 20:28 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 18:36各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 20:58 — 2026-11-11 20:58(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 20:28最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 18:36库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,673 已收录论文18,321 AI 相关6,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 20:25(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2606.27832

USAD: Uncertainty-aware Statistical Adversarial Detection

Zhijian Zhou, Xunye Tian, Jiacheng Zhang, Zesheng Ye, Yiyi Guo, Donghao Zhang, Liuhua Peng, Feng Liu

原文摘要

Statistical adversarial detection (SAD) treats detection as a two-sample test. Given a reference set of clean examples (CEs) and a batch of queries, potentially containing an unknown mixture of CEs and adversarial examples (AEs), SAD decides whether the query distribution drifts away from the CE distribution while controlling the false-alarm rate. Existing SAD-based methods mainly use maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) to measure the distributional discrepancy. However, MMD's distributional properties limit its ability to capture characteristic uncertainty patterns of AEs that are crucial for detection: AEs typically exhibit abnormal feature spread (i.e., global uncertainty) and instability under perturbations (i.e., local uncertainty). To close the gap, we propose Uncertainty-aware Statistical Adversarial Detection (USAD), which explicitly captures these uncertainty patterns with two new statistics: (1) Variance Discrepancy (VD), which measures the difference in feature spread between AEs and CEs to capture global uncertainty differences. (2) Perturbation-based Covariance Discrepancy (PCD), which compares feature covariance under Gaussian perturbations to capture local uncertainty differences. By aggregating VD and PCD, USAD achieves superior detection performances over baseline methods against various adversarial attacks, highlighting the importance of considering characteristic behaviors of AEs for effective SAD. Our code is available at: https://github.com/yeager20001118/USAD.

cs.LG

版本更新 · v3arXiv:2606.20820

CELEUS: Certifiable and Efficient LLM Evaluation via E-Processes

Zhijian Zhou, Zesheng Ye, Zhaorun Chen, Bo Li, Feng Liu

原文摘要

Can we trust evaluation scores to capture an LLM's true real-world performance? Certifiable evaluation answers this question by providing a confidence interval (CI) that covers the LLM's true performance with high probability (e.g., 95%). In particular, existing methods sequentially select evaluation samples from a fixed pool and keep updating the CI until certain conditions are satisfied, e.g., the CI width reaches a target precision. However, existing methods are not generally anytime-valid: the claimed coverage (e.g., 95%) may fail when CIs are repeatedly updated and used to decide when to stop, leaving a gap between theoretical rigor and practice. This paper bridges this gap by proposing CELEUS, a Certifiable framework for Efficient LLM evaluation, which leverages E-processes to build anytime-valid CIs. Concretely, we propose a new signal that combines two ingredients: (i) Uncertainty-guided sampling to select informative samples for evaluation, and (ii) Surrogate-assisted approximations for unevaluated samples. We prove that the new signal remains unbiased for the evaluation score conditional on the past, enabling statistically-grounded and anytime-valid e-process CIs. More importantly, the two ingredients reduce estimation variance and help reach the target precision with fewer evaluated samples. We also prove that CIs obtained by CELEUS can shrink at a near-parametric rate up to logarithmic factors and analyze the oracle variance-optimal sampling rule that motivates the empirical uncertainty-guided one. Experiments show that CELEUS reaches the target precision using 54-62% fewer evaluated samples than baselines, while preserving anytime-valid coverage. Code is available at https://github.com/zyecs/celeus.

cs.LG