Li Kang, Yutao Fan, Rui Li, Heng Zhou, Yiran Qin, Zhemeng Zhang, Songtao Huang, Xiufeng Song 等 14 位作者
General-purpose coding agents can now write, debug, and refine entire robot programs, but only if they have somewhere to practice. Physical hardware is a poor practice ground: exploratory rollouts are slow to reset and, when several arms share a workspace, unsafe. Generic simulation benchmarks are safe but do not match the geometry, assets, or viewpoints of the workspace where the robot must actually work. We present CoEx (Code-driven Exploration), which lets the agent practice in an executable digital twin of its own deployment workspace. The twin is built by CoEnv, our real-to-sim framework, which reconstructs the physical scene from multi-view RGBD into a physics simulation. Inside it, a centralized code agent explores at the program level, writing a complete multi-arm program, running it in the twin, and refining it against grounded verification (privileged state checks, checkpoint predicates on risky steps, and adaptive viewpoints against inter-arm occlusion). Verified programs transfer to hardware through collision-checked deployment. On five real-world multi-arm tasks with up to three heterogeneous robots, CoEx reaches 70% average success, against 50% for the same system without the code agent (where a VLM must choose every primitive step by step), outperforms two prior VLM-planning frameworks, and produces verified episodes at 3.8-11.7x the ablated rate. Because every verified rollout is also a demonstration, exploration leaves reusable experience behind: a $π_{0.5}$ policy fine-tuned purely on 200 agent-generated rollouts reaches 100% and 70% real-robot success on two tasks, with no human demonstrations.
LLM agents increasingly support research planning and execution, where judgments about current and anticipated research activity inform decisions. Yet whether they can infer changes across a whole field from the partial evidence they retrieve through online scholarly search remains unclear. We introduce Research Attention Prediction (RAP), a literature search benchmark for evaluating this ability. We build a local search environment from 356,357 dated arXiv papers and construct two complementary evaluation tasks. The benchmark comprises a Core set of 2,160 questions across 54 AI/ML fields and an Extended set covering 269 fields. Our evaluation and analysis of LLM agents show that search substantially improves stronger agents' recognition of recent changes, while forecasting gains remain limited or negative. Agents update forecasts across dates and adjust their investigations to forecasting goals, but these adaptations do not reliably yield accurate predictions of future shifts. Even for recent changes, final judgments can diverge from what the retrieved papers indicate. These findings show that agents can recognise some recent changes, yet reliably anticipating future research activity remains difficult despite changes in their answers and investigations.
Zeping Li, Hongru Wang, Yiwen Zhao, Guanhua Chen Southern University of Science and Technology, Yixia Li, Keyang Chen Fudan University, Yixin Cao Fudan University, Guangnan Ye Fudan University 等 10 位作者
Tool-using agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in tasks such as mathematical reasoning and multi-hop question answering. However, in long trajectories, agents often trigger excessive and low-quality tool calls, increasing latency and degrading inference performance, making managing tool-use behavior challenging. In this work, we conduct entropy-based pilot experiments and observe a strong positive correlation between entropy reduction and high-quality tool calls. Building on this finding, we propose using entropy reduction as a supervisory signal and design two reward strategies to address the differing needs of optimizing tool-use behavior. Sparse outcome rewards provide coarse, trajectory-level guidance to improve efficiency, while dense process rewards offer fine-grained supervision to enhance performance. Experiments across diverse domains show that both reward designs improve tool-use behavior: the former reduces tool calls by 72.07% compared to the average of baselines, while the latter improves performance by 22.27%. These results position entropy reduction as a key mechanism for enhancing tool-use behavior, enabling agents to be more adaptive in real-world applications.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Zelin Tan University of Science and Technology of China, Hejia Geng University of Oxford, Xiaohang Yu Imperial College London, Mulei Zhang, Guancheng Wan WanFlow AI and Wuhan University, Yifan Zhou, Qiang He, Xiangyuan Xue The Chinese University of Hong Kong and Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory 等 17 位作者
While scaling laws for large language models (LLMs) during pre-training have been extensively studied, their behavior under reinforcement learning (RL) post-training remains largely unexplored. This paper investigates the scaling behavior of Large Language Model (LLM) reinforcement learning post-training, focusing on mathematical reasoning. Through experiments across the Qwen2.5 series (0.5B to 72B), we characterize how model scale, data, and compute interact. Our analysis yields four key findings: 1. Larger models consistently demonstrate superior compute and data efficiency. 2. The relationship between model performance and training resources follows a predictive power-law across both base and instruction-tuned models. 3. RL learning efficiency exhibits a latent saturation trend with increasing model scale. 4. In data-constrained regimes, performance is primarily driven by the total volume of training data rather than sample uniqueness. These results offer practical guidelines for scaling reasoning capabilities through reinforcement learning post-training.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Yixia Li, Hongru Wang, Jiahao Qiu Princeton University, Zhenfei Yin University of Oxford and Stanford University, Dongdong Zhang Research, Microsoft, Cheng Qian University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Zeping Li, Xiaoteng Ma Mind Lab 等 10 位作者
Agentic learning increasingly hinges on interaction, yet real-world experience is expensive, limited, and often irreversible at inference time. World models promise to mitigate these limitations, but it remains unclear whether large language models can actually serve as reliable world models, and deliver concrete benefits to downstream agents. We investigate these questions in text-based environments, a controlled testbed that reframes language modeling as next-state prediction under interaction. We propose a three-level framework to evaluate LLM-based world models: (i) fidelity and consistency, (ii) scalability and robustness, and (iii) agent utility. Across five representative environments, we show that sufficiently trained world models capture coherent environment dynamics, scale predictably with data and model capacity, and unlock tangible agent improvements—for example, action verification boosts GPT-4o by 5.5% on WebShop, and warm-started RL achieves a 15% gain on SciWorld. Crucially, these benefits hinge on behavioral coverage and environment complexity, sharply characterizing when world modeling meaningfully advances agent learning.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.AI
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表