Manipulating diverse objects with multi-fingered dexterous hands is challenging due to the high dimensionality and complex dynamics. Human-Object Interaction (HOI) datasets provide rich knowledge about task information and embodied interactions. Instead of solely imitating the human demonstrations, our method learns to holistically predict future hand-object states by leveraging these datasets. The predicted future states of the object can serve as a general-purpose reward term for reinforcement learning, reducing reliance on task-specific reward engineering and enhancing generalization across tasks. We conduct extensive experiments on three manipulation tasks in simulation and the real world. Our approach outperforms existing SOTA methods in both success rate and generalizability on novel objects. Furthermore, we validate the cross-embodiment compatibility of our methods by successfully deploying the skills on different robot hands.
Markerless hand-eye calibration under continuous motion requires jointly resolving camera geometry and the time offset between images and joint states. We present SyncHeC (Synchronized Hand-Eye Calibration), a dense differentiable-rendering framework that estimates both from a single robot trajectory. Continuous-time forward kinematics makes latency differentiable, metric depth complements mask contours, and an offline planner combines spatial sensitivity with temporal excitation. Alternating updates support Eye-to-Hand, Eye-in-Hand, and multi-camera calibration. On a 7-DoF arm, one $6.5$\,s motion yields $0.21$\,cm translation error against a marker-board reference, $0.34$\,cm touch-test error, and $2.7$\,ms latency error relative to an $87$\,ms reference with $95\%$ uncertainty of $\pm1.5$\,ms. Against CM-Calib on matched recordings, translation and nominal latency errors improve by $3.7\times$ and $2.3\times$. Experiments span seven arms and four depth sensors. Compensating the recovered offset during policy training and deployment increases success by $8.1$ percentage points across six families and six tasks ($1{,}800$ matched pairs; paired $95\%$ confidence interval $[6.3,9.9]$ points).