跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1163新增论文
+868其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 05:59 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 06:29 — 2026-11-06 06:29(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 05:59最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 05:57(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.01489

CCD: Context-Calibrated Open-Entity Out-of-Distribution Detection in In-Context Tabular Foundation Models

Zhangkai Wu, Xu Zhang, Zhihao Hao, Zhihong Cui, Yongmin Yoo, Xianxun Zhu, Kaize Shi

In-context tabular foundation models (TFMs), such as TabPFN, predict from a labelled context without updating their parameters and are increasingly used for out-of-distribution (OOD) detection in Web applications, whose test rows come from entities absent from that context. Such applications need open-entity OOD detection: a new entity must not be mistaken for an unknown class, and an unknown class must still be caught. Existing detectors fail in this setting, and an entity-split gap hides the failure: random splits also place the test entities in the context. The failure arises because every TFM score reflects how unfamiliar a row is to the context. This produces an entity-over-class bias: known-class rows of new entities look more OOD than familiar ones, sometimes more than unknown classes. Specifically, the two OOD scores most widely used with in-context TFMs face an entity-class trade-off: the TFM's predictive confidence misses unknown classes, whereas the distance of a test row to the context flags new entities. To address this problem, we hold a group of entities out of the context and score them with the remaining context, which turns them into new entities of known classes and tells us how such rows should score. To measure detection on new entities, we build NEO-Tab (New-Entity OOD detection on Tables), 14 grouped and temporal tables on which all test rows come from new entities. We then propose Context-Calibrated Detection (CCD), which uses these group-out swaps on in-distribution data to calibrate three distances and the confidence against new-entity references. CCD weights them by their sensitivity and sharpness, keeps the model frozen and uses no OOD data. On NEO-Tab, CCD outperforms 16 existing detectors on every metric we report, and its lead holds on three TFM backbones.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.IR
arXiv ↗PDF ↗