跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1672新增论文
+1256其中 AI 相关
+198已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-14 06:58 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 20:44各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-13 09:24 — 2026-11-14 09:24(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-14 06:58最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 20:44库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,727 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-14 06:56(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15342

MechBench: A Domain-Specific LLM Benchmark for Parallel Mechanisms

Zhihao Xia, Tingting Wang, Hui Li, Yongheng Xing, Chunxu Tian

原文摘要

Parallel mechanisms pose distinctive challenges to large language models (LLMs), as valid reasoning depends jointly on mechanism topology, loop closure, geometry, joint types, and modeling assumptions. Yet existing LLM benchmarks provide little systematic coverage of such domain-specific knowledge, constraint-sensitive analysis, and constructive design. To fill this gap, we introduce MECHBENCH, a 2,541-question benchmark for evaluating LLMs in parallel mechanisms across professional knowledge, mechanism analysis, and design. MECHBENCH contains standard and challenge tiers spanning six capability categories and nine executable analysis and design tasks. It is constructed through MECHFORGE, a domain-grounded framework that combines expert-organized knowledge, LLM-assisted question generation, programmatic instance generation, two-stage expert review, and task-aware scoring with exact matching, rubric-based evaluation, and program verification. We further develop MECHGPT as a diagnostic domain-adapted model. Experiments show that strong knowledge performance does not directly translate into executable mechanism reasoning: leading closed-service models achieve over 95 on the standard tier but only 47-60 on the challenge tier, while domain adaptation substantially improves MechGPT over its Qwen3-8B baselines but leaves a large gap in constrained analysis and design. These results establish MECHBENCH as a systematic testbed for measuring domain-specific LLM capabilities in mechanism science.

cs.LG

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.01778

MemRole: From Memories to Decisions for Long-Horizon Reasoning in Role-Playing Agents

Mengting Li, Xilong Cheng, Zhihao Xiao, Zhenhua Xu, Jingyuan Zhou, Linfeng Li, Long Zhang, Borui Cai 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

LLM-based role-playing agents are fluent at imitating a character's style, yet struggle to make role-consistent decisions over long narrative horizons. Such decisions are shaped by experiences spanning many prior scenes, which are often partial and may point in different directions. Existing methods inject cross-scene memories as context, but do not reason about how past events shape a character's current motivations and behavior. We propose MemRole, a framework that makes this memory-to-decision process explicit. It introduces Long-Horizon Memory Thinking (LHMT), a reasoning schema that decomposes hidden reasoning into context understanding, memory activation, and response strategy planning, trained on a novel-derived dataset whose character-grounded, timeline-constrained memory pools limit each character to what it could plausibly know at the current narrative point. Beyond supervised fine-tuning, we propose Self-Refining On-Policy Self-Distillation (SR-OPSD): the model critiques its own rollouts against the reference under a data-driven rubric, and a critique-conditioned teacher view of the same model distills token-level guidance back into the policy. MemRole-32B improves over its backbone by 15.2 points on memory-grounded role-playing, performs on par with frontier LLMs such as GPT-5.4, and achieves the best character-motivation recognition accuracy on CroSS-MR.

cs.CL · cs.AI