跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 21:48 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 22:32 — 2026-11-08 22:32(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 21:48最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 21:46(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2606.31004

Where the Real Clips Came From: Corpus Identity in AI-Generated Video Detection

Mert Onur Cakiroglu, Zhihe Lu, Mehmet Dalkilic, Hasan Kurban

原文摘要

Benchmarks for detecting AI-generated video take their real clips from a few curated collections, so a clip's label is collinear with where it came from. We call a score's dependence on this origin corpus identity, and we measure it on four benchmarks and six real collections. Three probes read a file's declared frame types, the motion vectors its codec stores, and the frames' appearance. Frame-type counts alone separate real from generated at AUC 0.999 on GenVidBench, and re-encoding every clip with one setting at a fixed length still leaves 0.61 to 0.63 on three benchmarks. We introduce a fixed frame-type pattern that removes this leak from every clip of at least 2 s. The same re-encode lowers the ReStraV detector on GenVidBench from 0.85 to 0.60, just above the 0.59 its features reach between two real collections, because its 8 fps repeats frames in real clips. Motion vectors alone separate real collections from one another at AUC 0.51 to 0.98, and only one benchmark ships the two labeled real sources needed to measure this separation within it. In deployment, with each threshold set to flag 5% of its training benchmark's real clips, the motion-vector and appearance probes and linear readouts on ReStraV and WaveRep features each flag 15% or more of another real collection. Choosing the threshold on real videos from the target collection brings the rate back to about 5%, at the cost of catching fewer generated clips. Clearing the real-vs-real level does not guarantee replication: of the six feature sets whose GenVidBench score clears it by 0.15 or more, only WaveRep's two keep their score on AIGVDBench. A benchmark score is therefore best read together with that level, a score on a second benchmark, and false-positive rates on other real collections. The toolkit and the clip lists of every evaluation set are at https://github.com/KurbanIntelligenceLab/vidaudit.

cs.CV