跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1196新增论文
+992其中 AI 相关
+66已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 11:15 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-10 11:14各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 11:56 — 2026-11-10 11:56(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 11:15最近发现新增版本:2026-11-10 11:14库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-08 04:43

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

19,084 已收录论文16,280 AI 相关4,962 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 11:14(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02806

CARE: Contrastive Representation Learning with Environment-Invariance Regularization for Behavioural Intention Prediction

Shang Gao, Zhixin Huang, Franz Götz-Hahn, Konrad Doll, Bernhard Sick

原文摘要

Trajectory-based behavioural intention prediction faces environmental variation, and representations learned with a pooled contrastive objective may retain environment-specific regularities. We present CARE, a self-supervised trajectory-learning framework that couples temporally asymmetric contrastive views with an invariant-risk-minimisation (IRM)-style gradient penalty on environment-wise contrastive risks. Each input window yields an anchor, a partially masked positive view, and a temporally perturbed negative view. Masked reconstruction and observability-aware evidence consistency complement this objective by promoting temporal information retention under partial input. On an IMPTC-derived four-class intention task, CARE achieves 0.840 accuracy and 0.023 expected calibration error (ECE) under IID fine-tuning, and 0.806 accuracy with a Brier score of 0.308 on the reported held-out environment. Under frozen-encoder linear probing, reconstruction provides the largest individual held-out accuracy gain, whereas the complete objective yields the lowest held-out ECE (0.049) among tested variants. These results support the combined objective as a competitive representation-learning approach under the evaluated shift, while the IRM-style regulariser is not taken as evidence of formal invariance.

cs.LG