The widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs) is reshaping how textual content is produced, complicating text provenance, and raising concerns for misinformation, plagiarism, and intellectual property. While prior work on AI-generated text detection has progressed, one-dimensional human-AI co-authorship scores lack signals directly relevant to ``AI involvement''. It remains unclear how adversarial paraphrasing distorts detection signals. In this work, we formulate a discrete-class text provenance detection framework. This framework allows an abstraction of realistic co-authorship scenarios into distinct degrees of AI involvement, differentiating the AI polishing on the surface level from the AI updating the discourse structures. This framework reveals the mechanisms of how adversarial paraphrasing blurs the decision boundaries for co-authorship detectors. To improve robustness of the detectors, we augment training data with adversarial paraphrases generated by the state-of-the-art paraphrasing attack model, exposing detectors to challenging meaning-preserving rewrites. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets and generation models demonstrate that adversarial paraphrasing substantially degrades detectors trained only on benign data, while adversarial data augmentation leads to consistent robustness gains and good cross-generator transferability. Overall, our findings highlight the value of discrete-class formulation and principled data augmentation for building reliable detectors of human-AI co-authorship.
Yan Wang Yale University, Yitao Xu George Mason University, Nanhan Shen, Jinyan Su, Jimin Huang University of Manchester and The Fin AI, Zining Zhu Stevens Institute of Technology
Mixture of Experts models are widely assumed to achieve domain specialization through sparse routing. In this work, we question this assumption by introducing COMMITTEEAUDIT, a post hoc framework that analyzes routing behavior at the level of expert groups rather than individual experts. Across three representative models and the MMLU benchmark, we uncover a domain invariant Standing Committee. This is a compact coalition of routed experts that consistently captures the majority of routing mass across domains, layers, and routing budgets, even when architectures already include shared experts. Qualitative analysis further shows that Standing Committees anchor reasoning structure and syntax, while peripheral experts handle domain-specific knowledge. These findings reveal a strong structural bias toward centralized computation, suggesting that specialization in Mixture of Experts models is far less pervasive than commonly believed. Crucially, this inherent bias indicates that current training objectives, such as load-balancing losses that enforce uniform expert utilization, may be working against the model’s natural optimization path, thereby limiting training efficiency and performance.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表