Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in embodied agents to interpret visual inputs, reason about spatial relationships, and make task-level decisions based on that reasoning. However, a fundamental capability mismatch remains: general VLMs can reason about the overall task but often miss the visual details that determine success, while specialist vision models can capture those details but cannot translate them into task-level decisions. In this work, we propose SpatialCLI, a framework that teaches VLMs to reason with spatial tools and progressively internalize the specialist perceptual capabilities they provide. SpatialCLI proceeds in three stages: (1) Call exposes specialist vision models as spatial tools to augment the VLM's perception; (2) Learn uses Cold-Start SFT and agentic RL to improve tool use; and (3) Internalize verbalizes successful tool-use trajectories to internalize specialist perceptual capabilities. We further introduce SpatialCLI-Bench, a 516-example benchmark for compositional perception across localization, segmentation, depth, and pose. On MindCube, SpatialCLI raises Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct from 29.3% to 84.6% with tools, surpassing GPT-5.6 Sol with tools (72.1%), while retaining 73.8% without tools after internalization.
Zixuan Huang, Zhihong Zhu Tencent, Xiaolong Liu, Yanchao Hao Tencent PCG, Manman Zhang Tencent PCG, Zheng Wei Tencent Technology (Beijing) Company Limited, Bowen Xing University of Science and Technology Beijing, Xian Wu Tencent 等 11 位作者
Medical large Vision-Language Models (Med-LVLMs) have shown strong potential in multimodal clinical applications such as medical visual question answering and report generation. However, Med-LVLMs remain challenged by hallucinations caused by modality misalignment, where models prioritize textual knowledge over visual evidence and generate outputs that conflict with medical images. To mitigate this issue, recent studies have explored preference optimization to improve image–text alignment, achieving promising results. Despite these advances, existing preference-based methods still face two limitations in medical settings: (1) overfitting to superficial cues, and (2) pseudo convergence of the preference signal. In this paper, we propose Dynamic Evidence-Guided Preference Optimization (DEPO), a new framework that enables evidence-aware and adaptive preference learning for Med-LVLMs. DEPO introduces Multi-Modal Evidence Perturbation (MEP) to suppress non-causal textual and visual shortcuts, and Dispreferred Evidence Resampling (DER) to continuously update dispreferred responses as hallucination patterns evolve. Experiments on multiple medical VQA and report generation benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over existing methods, with strong robustness across datasets and architectures. All Codes and data will be released after review.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.CV
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Zixuan Huang, Yanxiang Ma University of Sydney, University of Sydney, Luhan Wang Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Yunke Wang University of Sydney, Duo Shi China Mobile Communications Company Limited Research Institute, Chang Xu
With the growing potential of large language models (LLMs) in the legal domain, domain-specific finetuning and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods have received widespread attention. However, current methods still suffer from hallucination risk and failing to resolve semantic drift and adapt to varying citation numbers. To address this, we propose Authoritative and Accurate Lawyer (AALawyer), a complementary dual-retriever framework based on the Legal Syllogism and the nature of different legal data. First, we introduce Symbolic Constrained Retrieval (SCR) for closed-set article retrieval, by constraining retrieval to the generative prediction. Second, we build Analogical Precedent Retrieval (APR) to retrieve open-set judicial precedents for reasoning with a newly collected large criminal dataset.Extensive experiments, including LawBench, our Hallucination Risk-Benchmark, and comprehensive ablation studies, demonstrate the effectiveness of AALawyer, which mitigates hallucinations while improving the explainability of legal reasoning.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表