跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 00:32 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 01:05 — 2026-11-15 01:05(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 00:32最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 00:30(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16197

Mechanical behaviour of the intact brain-skull interface under tension, compression and shear

Sajjad Arzemanzadeh, Karol Miller, Ron Kikinis, Adam Wittek

原文摘要

The brain-skull interface governs the boundary/contact conditions of the brain in computational head models, yet its mechanical behaviour remains poorly characterised experimentally. We characterised the brain-skull interface by testing brain-skull complex samples (skull bone, meninges and brain tissue in their native arrangement) excised from 19 sheep cadaver heads under uniaxial tension and compression at strain rates of 0.002, 0.02 and 0.2 s$^{-1}$ and simple shear at 0.02 s$^{-1}$. Histology confirmed that the meningeal layers remained intact and attached to the brain and skull after excision. We acquired magnetic resonance images of every sample, reconstructed their geometry and developed a sample-specific finite element model of each experiment. We represented the brain tissue using a second-order Ogden hyperelastic model and the brain-skull interface using a cohesive zone model. Using inverse finite element analysis, we first calibrated the brain tissue parameters for each subject. Keeping these parameters fixed, we then identified the interface parameters from the corresponding brain-skull complex specimen. The brain tissue shear modulus increased with strain rate from 0.94 $\pm$ 0.16 kPa at 0.002 s$^{-1}$ to 1.60 $\pm$ 0.30 kPa at 0.2 s$^{-1}$. In contrast, the interface properties (maximum normal traction 2.35 $\pm$ 0.81 kPa, maximum tangential traction 4.14 $\pm$ 0.97 kPa, and fracture energy 0.35 $\pm$ 0.14 N m$^{-1}$) showed no significant dependence on strain rate or loading mode. In all samples, failure occurred within the subarachnoid space. Neither a rigid brain-skull connection nor frictionless sliding contact with separation reproduced the measured mechanical response or failure mode of the brain-skull interface. Our experimentally derived cohesive zone model provides a realistic representation of the brain-skull interface for computational head models.

cs.CE