跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 07:30 — 2026-11-16 07:30(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15467

AutoOntic: Automatic Ontology Induction from Text for Knowledge Graph Construction

Alla Chepurova, Aydar Bulatov, Mikhail Burtsev, Yuri Kuratov

原文摘要

Graph-based retrieval-augmented generation depends on the quality of the knowledge graph (KG) it retrieves over, yet schema-free LLM-based extraction pipelines typically produce flat graphs: deduplicated entities and relations with no type hierarchy and no domain/range constraints. We present AutoOntic, a pipeline that automatically constructs an ontology from text by canonicalizing open-vocabulary entity types and relations, inducing a hierarchy over the canonicalized types, and mining relation-level domain and range constraints. Its hierarchy induction procedure prioritizes types using corpus-derived relation-argument profiles and places them through local, LLM-adjudicated parent/child checks, allowing newly inserted types to trigger reassignment of existing parent-child links. The resulting hierarchy constrains entity deduplication and supports the induction of relation-level domain/range constraints. For intrinsic evaluation, we introduce a reference-based protocol that classifies induced ontology types as exact, broader, narrower, or unrelated to reference domain and range classes. On the Wikidata-TekGen and DBpedia-WebNLG subsets of Text2KGBench, over 90% of AutoOntic's induced endpoint types are semantically aligned with the reference classes across two LLM backbones: about half match exactly, while most remaining differences concern granularity. On MINE, knowledge graphs organized using an ontology built by AutoOntic achieve 88% retrieval accuracy. AutoOntic is available at https://github.com/screemix/AutoOntic.

cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.LG