跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 06:00 — 2026-11-16 06:00(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2609.12841

A Graph-Based Approach for Mapping Kernel-Level Telemetry to MITRE ATT&CK

Matteo Lupinacci, Luigi Arena, Francesco Blefari, Angelo Furfaro

原文摘要

Mapping observed system behavior to standardized frameworks such as MITRE ATT&CK is essential for threat-informed defense. Existing automated methods mostly depend on Cyber Threat Intelligence reports, which offer only retrospective accounts of attacks. Kernel-level telemetry, i.e., system calls, instead provides first-hand evidence of adversary behavior, but its volume and complexity have limited its use for automated mapping. Its content also makes it unsuitable for cloud-based analysis: command lines carry credentials, events carry user identifiers and network endpoints, and during an incident the telemetry reveals which defenses failed. In this work, we present Trace2ATT&CK, a framework that maps kernel-level telemetry to ATT&CK techniques entirely within the defender's infrastructure. Trace2ATT&CK collects events via eBPF, reconstructs the attacker's activity as a process-centric provenance graph, and condenses it into a compact execution graph. This graph is classified by locally deployed open-weight LLMs, using either pure prompting or retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounded in the ATT&CK knowledge base, producing ranked technique candidates with supporting rationales. We evaluate Trace2ATT&CK on 347 Linux Atomic Red Team tests with seven open-weight LLMs. The best local configuration reaches an HR@5 of 66.57\% at the technique level. RAG improves over base prompting in every model and setting, by up to $+15.44$ percentage points, and the execution graph substantially outperforms raw telemetry while never exceeding the LLM context window. Finally, a frontier cloud model used as an upper-bound reference quantifies the cost of local inference at 24--28 percentage points. These results show that ATT&CK mapping from kernel-level telemetry is feasible without disclosing sensitive evidence to third-party services.

cs.CR · cs.AI