跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 19:05 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 19:15 — 2026-11-15 19:15(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 19:05最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 19:03(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2602.02699

Sparsely Supervised Diffusion

Wenshuai Zhao, Zhiyuan Li, Yi Zhao, Mohammad Hassan Vali, Martin Trapp, Joni Pajarinen, Juho Kannala, Arno Solin

原文摘要

Diffusion models have shown remarkable success across a wide range of generative tasks. However, they often suffer from spatially inconsistent generation, arguably due to excessive correlations learned by the model. This can produce samples that are locally plausible but globally inconsistent. We propose a principled method to mitigate this issue. Our method, sparsely supervised diffusion (SSD), is a simple yet effective masking framework that can be implemented with only a few lines of code. We analytically show that SSD fundamentally alters diffusion model training by modifying the spectrum of the data covariance and that it suppresses correlations in the data covariance matrix. Experiments show that our method more accurately approximates the underlying population score function, reduces memorization on small datasets, and promotes the use of essential contextual information during generation. Moreover, even when up to 98\% of pixels are masked, it achieves competitive FID scores across a range of datasets and, importantly, avoids the training instability commonly observed on small datasets.

cs.LG · cs.AI

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02053

Learning to Look: A Foundation for Visual Understanding

Wenshuai Zhao, Yihao Wang, Benjamin Robson, Juho Kannala, Arno Solin

原文摘要

Vision-language models (VLMs) suffer from visual hallucination, such as saying an object that is not present in an image. We ask a more fundamental question: whether a VLM is even aware of where it is looking before understanding the semantic meaning in the image. We formulate this question as a LOOK task: identifying which parts of its visual input were available to the model. We construct the task in a self-supervised way without manually labeling the available region to the model. Our experiments show that existing VLMs fail to localize the visible region. We further show that fine-tuning VLMs on the proposed LOOK task improves a model's awareness of visual input.

cs.CV