跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 02:14 — 2026-11-16 02:14(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.13471

Context Types: Bunched Modalities for Unifying Safety and Reachability

Zhe Zhou, Benjamin Delaware, Suresh Jagannathan

原文摘要

Most type systems are designed to verify safety properties: the judgement $e : τ$ holds if $e$ may evaluate to any value contained in the denotation of $τ$, but nothing more. More recent type systems have considered the complementary class of reachability properties: in these systems, the typing judgment holds if $e$ must be able to evaluate to every value denoted by $τ$, and possibly more. This paper introduces a refinement type system for higher-order functional programs where types can capture both safety and reachability properties. Simultaneously supporting both is challenging because each imposes different constraints on how variable bindings in a typing context are interpreted. We address this challenge by treating typing contexts as a kind of resource that mediates which capabilities are available when typing a program. We formalize this notion by developing a resource algebra of contextual capabilities and a bunched modal context logic over this algebra. We then interpret our type system in this logic, establishing soundness with respect to a denotational semantics that unifies safety and reachability guarantees within a single typing judgement.

cs.PL · cs.LO