跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 00:32 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 01:05 — 2026-11-15 01:05(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 00:32最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 00:30(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15829

Training Calibrated Conditional Generative Models with a Sample-Only Coverage Loss

Benjamin Remy, Raphael Rossellini, Chihway Chang, Rebecca Willett

原文摘要

Conditional generative models have become the tool of choice for sampling posteriors in scientific inverse problems, where we seek to sample images or signals conditioned on a set of indirect and noisy measurements. Yet they are often overconfident, which is a critical failure in scientific applications where accurate uncertainty quantification is essential. Existing regularizers fall short in complementary ways: differentiable coverage objectives require the model's density and do not identify the posterior, while strictly proper scoring rules such as the energy score need only samples but do not directly enforce coverage. We close this gap by introducing a differentiable loss function based on the expected coverage probability, estimated from samples alone. It applies to any conditional generative model, with no need for tractable densities or architectural changes. We prove that it is a strict divergence, vanishing if and only if the model equals the true posterior. On simulation-based inference benchmarks, it matches a density-based coverage loss without evaluating the density. On high-dimensional imaging inverse problems, it yields better-calibrated posteriors than scoring-rule regularizers, with little change in the reconstruction quality of point estimates.

cs.LG · stat.ME · stat.ML

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10228

FAIR Universe Weak Lensing ML Uncertainty Challenge: Dataset and Cosmological Inference Competition

Biwei Dai, Po-Wen Chang, Erwan Allys, Wahid Bhimji, Boris Bolliet, Thomas Borrett, Paolo Calafiura, Ragansu Chakkappai 等 40 位作者

原文摘要

Weak gravitational lensing is a powerful cosmological probe that enables direct mapping of the matter distribution and precise constraints on the fundamental parameters governing structure formation in the universe. In recent years, machine learning has shown strong potential for extracting cosmological information from weak-lensing data beyond traditional summary statistics. However, progress has been limited by the lack of standardized benchmarks that capture the complexity of the dataset, simulator imperfections, and various systematic biases encountered in realistic analyses. To address this gap, we present the FAIR Universe Weak Lensing Machine Learning Uncertainty Challenge, one of the NeurIPS 2025 competitions, as a benchmark dataset and evaluation study. Our dataset reflects realistic weak-lensing observations, incorporating multiple systematic biases, and thereby providing a controlled testbed for robust cosmological inference under uncertainties. We summarize the main methodological advances developed by the winners of our challenge, including data augmentation with conditional optimal transport, an AI-agent-driven approach for parameter inference, ensemble learning, Vision Transformer-based architectures, and physics-informed feature integration. By unifying the benchmark dataset and the winning solutions, this work provides a community resource for developing and evaluating machine learning methods for weak lensing cosmology and, more broadly, for scientific inference under systematic uncertainties.

astro-ph.CO · cs.AI · cs.CV · cs.LG · physics.data-an