跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 04:40 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 05:14 — 2026-11-15 05:14(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 04:40最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 04:38(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.14942

Emergent Vision-Shaped Thinking in Text-Only Reasoning through Multimodal Training

Qi Zhang, Bohan Wang, Qianru Sun, Hanwang Zhang

原文摘要

Does multimodal training shape how a language model thinks, even when the input is text only? We test this with targeted causal ablations across 10 multimodal configurations from 6 model families, with matched text-only backbones and cross-family transfer controls. We contrast spatial-imagery tasks that invite mental scene construction with symbol-manipulation tasks solvable by symbolic rules alone. We identify a vision-language axis in hidden-state space and ablate its projection at inference. In Chameleon-7B, this ablation drops accuracy on BIG-Bench Hard (BBH) navigate by 27.6 pp while leaving boolean expressions intact (+5.6 pp), a 33.2 pp double dissociation. The effect is direction-specific and layer-localized, extends to mental-simulation tasks such as mental rotation, paper folding, and perspective taking, and is not explained by task difficulty, reasoning depth, or sequential update load. Together, these results reveal emergent vision-shaped thinking (EVT): text-only reasoning that causally recruits representations introduced or strengthened by vision-language training, without assuming an image-like internal format. The measured effect is spatially concentrated at 7-8B and broadens to non-spatial visual attribute binding in the tested 32B configuration. In dual-path unified models (BAGEL, Janus-Pro), the causal handle localizes to the generation pathway as a compact one-dimensional carrier. The understanding pathway also encodes spatial information in a higher-rank, probe-decodable form, but is not the causal handle. To separate decodability from causal use, we analyze concentration, alignment, and semantic location. These diagnostics explain why behavior, probing, and intervention can diverge. Multimodal training thus reshapes the geometry of text-only reasoning, not just how visual input is processed.

cs.AI · cs.CV

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.09096

Trajectory Forcing: Exploiting Diffusion Trajectories for Autoregressive Long Video Generation

Bohan Wang, Shuo Chen, Yunzhi Li, Zhaozheng Chen, Junzhe Zhang, Hanwang Zhang

原文摘要

Autoregressive (AR) modeling is arguably the only way to extend a fixed-length video diffusion model to longer or even streaming videos. However, existing AR diffusion methods use only the previously predicted chunk as context for the next, discarding the intermediate predictions that constitute the chunk's generation history. In contrast, conventional AR models such as LLMs condition on the entire history of preceding tokens. To this end, we propose Trajectory Forcing (TraF), an AR diffusion method that exploits the denoising trajectories of previous video chunks as context. TraF operates under two training regimes: (1) with ground-truth videos, where pseudo-trajectories are constructed from Gaussian interpolations and re-predicted by the model, and (2) with a teacher model, where real trajectories are obtained from the student's own denoising rollout. The first regime naturally provides a strong initialization for the second. On the 5-second VBench benchmark, TraF achieves a Total score of 85.15, outperforming Self Forcing (+0.84) and Causal Forcing (+1.11), with Quality and Semantic improving simultaneously. On 30-second generation---6$\times$ the training horizon---TraF achieves the highest overall quality among all compared methods.

cs.CV