跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+101新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 00:32 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 01:06 — 2026-11-15 01:06(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 00:32最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 00:30(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.17213

异构多机器人系统通过迭代聚类的协作任务分配

Collaborative Task Allocation for Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Systems Through Iterative Clustering

David R. Martin, Brooks A. Butler, Scott Nivison, Magnus Egerstedt, Mohammad Abdullah Al Faruque, Pramod Khargonekar

AI 速读 基于摘要

提出一种迭代聚类算法,将异构多机器人协作任务分配这一全局优化问题分解为可处理的子问题,并在仿真中与多种基线方法比较。

cs.RO

查看原文摘要

Multi-robot systems face the challenge of efficiently allocating teams of heterogeneous robots to tasks. The task allocation problem is complicated by collaborative interactions between robots where teams of robots develop emergent capabilities that enable them to complete tasks that would be inefficient or impossible for individual robots. To address these challenges, we present an iterative clustering algorithm for collaborative task allocation in heterogeneous multi-robot systems. This approach partitions the computationally intractable global optimization problem into smaller, tractable subproblems by iteratively forming clusters of robots and tasks, then optimizing assignments within each cluster. By ensuring robots remain clustered with their currently assigned tasks, we guarantee monotonic improvement in overall utility with each iteration. We analyze the convergence of the algorithm and characterize how cluster size constraints determine which suboptimal assignments could trap the algorithm. In simulation, iterative clustering consistently outperforms simulated annealing, and a group-based auction in both computation time and solution quality, and outperforms a hedonic game approach in solution quality.