论文库

原文摘要

It is often desirable to generate and release synthetic graphs, which resemble real-world data, in a privacy-preserving way. While substantial progress has been made in designing private graph synthesizers (PGS), opportunities remain for more explicit connections between synthesizer models and privacy evaluation, and better accounting for output variation. This paper proposes GSynPEF, a practical framework for empirical evaluation of privacy and utility in settings for which a real-world graph is given as input and output synthetic graph(s) are observed. Our framework links a broad class of graph synthesizers (both statistical and deep-learning based) with privacy metrics, expanding evaluation dimensions to practical utility and risk, through empirical analysis of multiple actual outputs. The framework accommodates both an Exact Solution scenario, where synthesizer behavior is directly observable, and a Monte Carlo Approximation scenario where only synthetic outputs from a black box synthesizer are available. Extensive experiments on four real-world datasets and seven widely used graph synthesizers demonstrate framework's versatility, enabling privacy evaluation for different attack goals (e.g., to infer an edge or node) and capabilities (e.g., observing one or multiple synthetic graphs). We analyze evaluation results by examining the relationship between graph statistics and synthesizer design choices, providing insights for data curators in PGS selection and researchers for improved PGS design.