跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 02:35 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 02:42 — 2026-11-15 02:42(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 02:35最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 02:34(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2606.08914

Vibe Visualizing: How Visualization Novices Try (and Fail) to Generate and Interpret Visualizations with Conversational AI

Sam Yu-Te Lee, Yun-Hsin Kuo, Chifang Chou, Matthew Ward, Xiwei Xuan, Kwan-Liu Ma

原文摘要

Conversational AI lowers technical barriers to generating and interpreting visualizations. People without visualization training or practical experience can therefore perform these tasks, but may lack the expertise needed to evaluate the resulting charts and interpretations. Through a study with 20 visualization novices, we examine conversation logs from 60 sessions with ChatGPT and develop a codebook that characterizes participant and AI behaviors in AI-assisted visualization. Paired with interview transcripts and survey responses, we derive three themes under outcome quality, AI non-compliance, and trust, verification, and repair. An exploratory role analysis identifies two session-level roles distinguished by user initiative and associated with different failure patterns. A comparative analysis with Gemini and Claude further reveals distinct system-specific behaviors. Based on these findings, we derive five design recommendations for AI-assisted visualization design and discuss implications for visualization literacy, human-AI roles, accountability, and agentic visualization.

cs.HC