论文库

原文摘要

Large language models (LLMs) often achieve strong benchmark accuracy yet remain brittle under small distribution shifts. While recent mechanistic studies reveal the discrepancy between LLMs and humans in skill compositions, the learning dynamics of skill acquisition and the role of data distributions remain elusive. In this study, we train transformers on synthetic arithmetic tasks with black-box model-agnostic metrics for analyzing non-human skill compositions. We discover that transformers often acquire skills for arithmetic in reverse order or in parallel instead of human-like sequential rules--a phenomenon we refer to as shattered compositionality. To explain these behaviors, we provide evidence that correlational matching to the training data, rather than causal or procedural composition, shapes learning dynamics. As a consequence, this non-human acquisition creates competition between partially learned skills, producing characteristic mixing errors and weaker robustness under controlled distribution shifts. We further show that the same qualitative behavior persists in modern LLMs and is not mitigated by pure model scaling or scratchpad supervision. Our results highlight a mismatch between training-time skill acquisition and the human-like hierarchical compositions, with implications for reasoning reliability and out-of-distribution robustness.