跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 00:32 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 01:08 — 2026-11-15 01:08(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 00:32最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 00:30(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2611.13640

EyeQ: Exploring Corneal Reflection for Mobile Context Sensing

Jaewook Lee, Judith Amores, Donghoon Shin, Bo-Eun Choi, Jason Kim, Davin Win Kyi, Seok-Young Kim, Jon E. Froehlich 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

What if a single face-facing camera could sense your surroundings---through your eyes? We introduce EyeQ, which explores corneal reflection as a modality for context-aware mobile interaction. Traditional vision-based context sensing relies on world-facing cameras that demand explicit aiming or dual-camera setups; EyeQ instead shows that an off-the-shelf VLM can read scene context from corneal reflections captured with a smartphone camera. To recover usable detail from mobile corneal crops, EyeQ pairs on-device iris-guided capture with server-side AI enhancement, then leverages VLMs to extract scene types, names, and objects from warped, unfamiliar eye-image sequences. In an N=10 study, we characterize how capture conditions shape reflection fidelity, evaluate what VLMs detect, misclassify, and hallucinate, and demonstrate interaction opportunities, including detecting a steering wheel to distinguish drivers from passengers. This work reframes the eye in HCI---from a target for gaze estimation to a passive mirror of one's surroundings---and examines the privacy tensions it raises.

cs.HC

新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.39488

InterA11y: Interactive Web Accessibility Error Detection with LLM Agents

Mingyuan Zhong, Mengqi Shi, Davin Win Kyi, Ajit Mallavarapu, Xia Chen, James Fogarty, Jacob O. Wobbrock

原文摘要

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown potential to expand the coverage of web accessibility evaluation. However, current LLM-based checkers neglect much of the interactive and dynamic web contexts, resulting in limited coverage, high false discovery rates, and inconsistent performance across models. We present InterA11y, an agentic accessibility evaluation system that combines rubrics and interactive tools to support LLM agents in evaluating accessibility effectively. The rubrics decompose WCAG success criteria (SC) into testable aspects and guide agents in collecting and interpreting evidence. The interactive tools inspect or operate a webpage deterministically to collect evidence, such as focus appearances and error messages. We developed these rubrics and tools on 682 curated test cases grounded in established accessibility guidelines that target 10 commonly violated SC. We evaluated InterA11y on 197 expert-annotated cases sampled from 54 real webpages. Results show InterA11y achieves higher recall than the strongest evaluated LLM-driven baseline (79.0% vs. 44.4%), while maintaining comparable precision to best rule-based checkers (93.1% vs. 90.3-97.6%), with little variability between models. Further, when equipped with our interactive tools, general-purpose web agents detect more accessibility errors with fewer false positives and less token usage than without these tools.

cs.HC