跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 06:11 — 2026-11-16 06:11(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15842

Fewer Expert Transfers Without Changing Routing: Expert Eviction for MoE Offloading

Pierre-Luc Bacon, Diego Calanzone, Jean-Maxime Larouche

原文摘要

A mixture-of-experts (MoE) language model uses only a few experts per token, so a server can keep most expert weights in CPU memory and copy an expert to the GPU when the router requests it. Recent methods train the router to keep the same experts for several tokens, and treat fewer routing switches as a proxy for fewer copies. We measure the trade-off directly, in a harness that performs and times real CPU-to-GPU copies for OLMoE-1B-7B. On an L40S GPU, every tested policy that holds an expert set fixed and decodes faster than the least-recently-used (LRU) cache increases next-token loss by at least 0.067 nats. A change that leaves every routing decision intact does better: when the cache must evict an expert, evict the one whose next use lies farthest in the future. This rule copies 2.1x fewer experts than LRU at no loss in quality and is within 3.5% of the fewest copies possible. It needs future requests; the next sixteen tokens of demand recover 96% of its reduction, whereas a rule based on counts of past requests recovers 27%.

cs.LG · cs.DC