跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文，按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描：2026-11-15 08:47 · 全站最近入库：2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 08:57 — 2026-11-15 08:57（北京时间） · 点击数字查看对应简报；AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查：2026-11-15 08:47最近发现新增版本：2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间：2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常；新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

研究日报 / 周报 →按信源浏览 →

时间范围跟随排序：版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常，查看状态 →

找到 4 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 08:46（北京时间）
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16667

People prefer AI to human advice in multi-turn conversations but neither changes incentivised behaviour

Maximilian Maier, Tsz Kwan Emmy Wong, Jiahao Eric Yang, Falk Lieder, Vanessa Cheung

原文摘要

People increasingly ask AI chatbots for advice, yet large language models (LLMs) are sycophantic, overconfident, and can amplify human cognitive biases. In this article, we investigate how people perceive advice from humans versus LLMs and whether AI advice reshapes incentive-compatible donation decisions. Using Carrier, a new experimental platform, we designed an experiment where participants made a donation decision after discussing it with an AI chatbot advisor, another human, or receiving no advice. Participants judged LLM advisors to be significantly more rational, trustworthy, convincing, and sycophantic than human advisors. Analysis of chatlogs showed that LLMs were more engaged than human advisors: they shared more facts and more often stated their opinion and justified their recommendations. Despite this, donation decisions did not vary across conditions.

cs.HC

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2611.03412

DeliverBench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Delivering Realistic Multi-Stage Professional Projects

Yumou Liu, Mingju Chen, Zhoufutu Wen, Qianyu Yang, Zijie Wang, Sihan Chen, Yeqian Liu, Chenghao Yang 等 24 位作者

原文摘要

LLM agents are judged by what they deliver, and in professional work what gets delivered is a project, not a task. A project pays off only if the whole package holds together, and one weak part can limit the value of the rest. Yet existing benchmarks mostly test agents on one task at a time, leaving a gap between the capability we measure and the outcome that makes agents useful. To address this gap, we introduce DeliverBench, which tests whether agents can carry a project from brief to final delivery. Reconstructed from real materials with 13 domain experts, its 11 projects span settings such as financial due diligence, legal contract drafting, and drug safety reporting. They comprise 150 subtasks, with 2-15 subsequent releases of new materials and client feedback per project. Later subtasks build on the agent's own earlier deliverables, so unresolved errors can carry into downstream work. Expert rubrics assess each subtask submission and the final delivery package. Across seven model-harness systems, the best scores 65.0/100 on final delivery and passes 50.0% of subtasks at a 90-point threshold. Together, these results suggest that task-level capability does not simply compose into delivery; delivery also depends on keeping the work coherent as it evolves.

cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38095

Nemotron 3.5 Super and Lightning: Open, Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Models for Agentic AI

NVIDIA, :, Aastha Jhunjhunwala, Aayushi Ashokkumar Srivastava, Abhibha Gupta, Abhinav Garg, Abhinav Khattar, Achsah Wildish 等 559 位作者

原文摘要

We introduce Nemotron 3.5 Super and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, open and efficient Mixture-of-Experts Hybrid Mamba-Transformer models designed for reasoning, long-context understanding, and agentic workloads. Super is a 120B-parameter, 12B-active multimodal model, while Lightning is a smaller 30B-parameter, 3B-active text model; both designed for efficient deployment. Both models combine large-scale distillation, long-context training, and native speculative decoding, while Super further incorporates Indic continued pretraining and agentic software-engineering mid-training. We develop a comprehensive post-training pipeline spanning supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning (RLVR and RLHF), complemented in Super by specialized teacher training and multi- teacher on-policy distillation (MOPD). This transforms Super from a text-only base model into a multimodal agent capable of reasoning over text, images, video, and interactive tool environments. We further explore test-time scaling through parallel agent execution and self-verification. Across training and deployment, we jointly optimize capability and efficiency. Indic continued pretraining improves Indian-language benchmarks by up to 9.82 percentage points, while agentic mid-training strengthens software-engineering capabilities and robustness across agent harnesses. The post-trained Super model achieves 51.78% on SWE-bench Pro, surpassing Nemotron 3 Ultra despite using approximately 4.6x fewer active parameters. Post-training MTP boosting improves speculative- decoding acceptance length by up to 21.8% under probabilistic draft sampling, while NVFP4 quantization achieves 99.62% median accuracy recovery relative to BF16. Inference optimizations enable up to 4,856 output tokens/s/GPU on GB200 while sustaining at least 50 tokens/s/user.

cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.LG

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1642ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

EVM-QuestBench: An Execution-Grounded Benchmark for Natural-Language Transaction Code Generation

Pei Yang gradient, Wanyi Chen Soochow University, Ke Wang Gradient Network, Lynn Ai, Eric Yang, Tianyu Shi matrixgenlab

原文摘要

Large language models are increasingly applied to various development scenarios. However, in on-chain transaction scenarios, even a minor error can cause irreversible loss for users. Existing evaluations often overlook execution accuracy and safety. We introduce EVM-QuestBench, an execution-grounded benchmark for natural-language transaction-script generation on EVM-compatible chains. The benchmark employs dynamic evaluation: instructions are sampled from template pools, numeric parameters are drawn from predefined intervals, and validators verify outcomes against these instantiated values. EVM-QuestBench contains 107 tasks (62 atomic, 45 composite). Its modular architecture enables rapid task development. The runner executes scripts on a forked EVM chain with snapshot isolation; composite tasks apply step-efficiency decay. We evaluate 20 models with 5 independent rounds each and find large performance gaps, with split scores revealing persistent asymmetry between single-action precision and multi-step workflow completion. Code: https://github.com/OpenEdgeHQ/EVM-quest-bench.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表